Can anyone PROVE that the official 9/11 story is the truth?

Question

Can anyone PROVE that two planes was enough to cause 3 buildings to collapse?

Can anyone PROVE that the pancake theory allows for the buildings to come down at FREE FALL speed?

Can anyone PROVE that Mayor Guiliani did not send all those steel beams to China to be melted down...before anyone had a chance to look at the evidence?

Can anyone PROVE that fire for only an hour or so, is sufficient to melt steel, when other similar buildings burned for hours and days, and remained standing?

Can anyone PROVE that those three buildings did not collapse due to controlled demolition?

Answer 1

Once again some one mentions that maybe there is fault in the party line explanation of things and the lemmings chant in unison as they head recklessly to the cliff of combined ignorance.
You hear them chant History Channel ignoring the fact that the History Channel had a special on last summer showing how the Magic bullet of the Warren Commission actually happened(Of Course they replaced the pristine bullet that any one over the age of forty remembers being put into evidence with a mushroomed bullet that makes it all make comfortable sense)Can you say Ministry of Truth!!! East Coaster at least put his propaganda out there so I can see how his mind was swayed. However it still does not explain how Newtons law of motion was defied. If something is falling and it hits something on the way down and makes it fall too the rate of speed will decline exponentially as it hits each obstruction and eventually come to a compiled halt. It will not pick up speed unless of course it isn't hitting anything on the way down because the floors below are being systematically demolished before the floor above. This could ONLY be accomplished in a CONTROLLED DEMOLITION. And this is the only explanation that is supported by the laws of physics which know no politics.
Also one should always hold in account who had what to gain. If it correlates to opportunity than you have established enough motive to at least obtain a search warrant.
Ruby Lady it is refreshing to see someone can still put two and two together and have it equal four even if Big Brother and O'Brien says it is five!

Answer 2

No more than anyone can prove that the unofficial 9/11 stories have true credibility.

Answer 3

Well I would not rely solely on the media productions of a few people to sway away from the offical story. But instead I will direct you to http://911scholars.org/ there are some great scientific articles. I would good a goold search for an MIT physics professor and his conclusions of 9/11.

Also remember the net is full of bias so do your research on both sides!

Answer 4

there is no way a 757 hit the pentagon. i don`t care what any of the dumb asses say. a 16 foot hole is not what would be left in the impact zone not to mention the 12 tons of jet engine that just disappeared on impact. how could the plane "vaporize" and still they recovered 180 or so bodies and identify them?
jet fuel burns off on impact, a lot of fires in a lot of other hi rises that did`nt collapse. the only 3 that ever completely collapsed were on 911

Answer 5

I'm sorry I can not prove that the 9/11 story is true. In fact, in all my research, I have only been able to find one piece of solid evidence that supports the Official 9/11 story. When weighed against all the other evidence, I would have to conclude that the governments story is part of "The Big Lie".

Most all the evidence that is available to us, show that the WTC buildings were rigged with explosives. Our own government had motive as was well as an opportunity to do this crime. Here is the evidence, presented for your scrutiny.

FAKE CONFESSION
The official government story is that the 9/11 attack was orchestrated by Al Qaeda, which is lead by Osama bin Laden. The proof our government provided was a video with Osama confessing to the crime. The problem with the video is that the person in the video does not look like Osama bin Laden: See picture.
http://911blimp.net/vid_fakeOsamaVideo.shtml
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pk519bkcLjg

EVIDENCE
There are many other factors that do not fit the official story. They include, secondary explosions that were seen, heard, reported, and recorded by firefighters, in and around the WTC buildings.
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-4574366633014832928&q=firefighter+bombs+in+the+building
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcRs1fv8i3I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHz9YWVgJWM

Here is a video clip showing a trail of explosions just before the destruction wave.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_DkzhonpGY&mode=related&search=

Molten, beyond red hot, "steel" was video recorded coming out of the South Tower just before it collapsed. Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to turn steel to liquid. Melted red hot steel was also found in "ground zero" of all three WTC buildings, including WTC7; the one no jet ever hit.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ExrVgioIXvk&search=thermite
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3D2myMbQjQ

FORENSICS
A chemical analysis of the solidified molten iron,conducted by independent firms, yielded an explosive, called Thermite. Also found was a WTC core beam; most probably cut using the demolition cutting charge (Thermate). No core beams were left standing beyond a few feet high, for it to have been cut by an Iron Workers torch. Click on pic. to enlarge.
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/06/341238.shtml
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc_charges.html

CONFESSION
We also have a video recording, where owner Larry Silverstein, admits to demolishing WTC7.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7750532340306101329

MOTIVE
The New Conservatives (Neo-Cons), with the help of their friends, started planning the invasion of Iraq, shortly after Pres. Bush took office. Apparently, the plan would include the attack of the WTC buildings. It did this to get the support of congress and the nation, to attack Iraq. Read it from their own PENAC document. Pay special attention to the section entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force" page 50 and the top of page 51, where it states we need a new Pearl Harbor attack to get the ball rolling.
http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf

OPPORTUNITY
Witnesses saw a work crew going into the WTC buildings with rolls of wire, supposedly for internet upgrades. Tenants were moved around while crews "upgraded" the cable systems. The Port Authority cut power to the building for a whole weekend, just prior to the attack; shutting down the entire security systems. Witnesses also heard crews operating heavy hammering equipment that left a gray cement like dust, in the building. This activity took place just weeks before the 911 attack: The Port Authority had released control of the buildings to Larry Silverstein, six weeks prior to the attack: He made upwards of $5 billion off of the attack.
See "9/11 Mysteries" video: Time = 1:03:55 through 1:07:00 and 1:19:55 through 1:24:09
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003&q=911+mysteries&hl=en-CA

__________________________________

There is also strong evidence to support a Douglas A-3 Skywarrior armed with a missile hit the Pentagon. One thing we can be certain about; it was not a Boeing 757, as our government claims. Listen to this retired General, He says, "The Plane does not fit the hole; so what did hit the Pentagon...?"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2VoUN-7RVU&eurl=

One might expect to see three holes in the pentagon, one for the main body and two more for each engine. The engine and engine parts were found outside of the building, they never penetrated the building thus no hole was created by them. The deep 18 foot hole was most probably made by an on board missile and not the aircraft itself. A radiation expert claims high-radiation readings near the Pentagon indicates depleted uranium (DU) munitions may have been used.
http://www.rense.com/general67/radfdf.htm

Witnesses say, the U.S. military secretly had Raytheon Co. refit an A-3 Skywarrior with new jet engines, a missile, and a Global Hawk guidance system, just prior to 9/11. Coincidentally, five key executives of Raytheon Co. went missing on 9/11. The official word is they died in the hijacked planes on 9/11.
http://tomflocco.com/fs/WitnessesLink.htm

The Jet engine(s) found may be key to identifying what type of aircraft hit the Pentagon: At the very least, they help determine a Boeing 757 did not hit the Pentagon. Both the jet engine housing as well as a "front end rotor head" have been identified as belonging to a Pratt & Whitney JT8D jet engine. The P&W JT8D engine has been used on the smaller Boeing 727 as well as a retrofit for the A-3 Skywarior. Two P&W JT8D's do not provide enough thrust to get a Boeing 757 off the ground much less sufficient power to perform the military precision maneuvers the aircraft in question did.
http://www.rense.com/general63/ident.htm
http://www.karlschwarz.com/02-02-05_Schwarz.pdf

A photograph of a cracked windshield found at the crash site strongly resembles the top canopy glass found on the Skywarrior: No windows of this shape are found on a Boeing 757.
http://home.att.net/~carlson.jon/911Pentagon.htm

The landing gear is the one part found in the crash site that may be linked to a Boeing 757. It could also be a part that was retrofitted on an A-3 Skywarrior, since the wheels would most likely need to be replaced with something still available.
http://www.pentagonresearch.com/084.html

A geometric analysis can show the aircraft that hit the Pentagon is under 85 feet long and therefore too small to be a Boeing 757, which is over 155 feet long. An A-3 Skywarrior is 76 feet 4 inches long. See geometric analysis: also see revision note under comments.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Avt4N5qfsIKkwbXeL7iLXmPsy6IX?qid=20061122203115AAj8XR6

Answer 6

Yes the fact that those planes flew into the buildings and they came down is PROOF! (Gravity pushes all things down) After the tragedies engineers concluded that it was lack of fireproofing around the steel beams and the intense heat generated from the fire that weakened them. They inspected that stuff before it was shipped. Did you see the news that day? I think your far fetched conspiracy theories are just that. All of those theories have already been disproven. Get a life.

Answer 7

As I have said before you conspiracy theorists really need to get a life and move on. Can you PROVE that the world is round and not really flat? This question reminds me of the doubters in Queen Isabella's court when they asked Columbus the same question! Believe what you want to believe. Obviously you haven't done your homework. Instead of 9-11, why don't you concentrate on 10-12-1492 and start forward?

Answer 8

Controlled demolition? Are you a conspiracy theorist or one who never watches a scientific program? Or perhaps both. Nova, on PBS, broadcast several programs about the subject as it was proceeding along and afterward too, as did the History Channel, to name a few. Every major reputable news source broadcast the same programs or programs similar to them.
The National Institute of Science and Technology, working with the engineers who designed the buildings, conducted extensive tests to determine the exact causes of the building's collapse. You may search their site yourself. Yours is an unbelievably insensitive question. And who cares if the steel was sent to China? It is scrap. However, the answer is no. It was recycled here in the United States and recast to build a Navy ship. Congress and the NIST published its findings. I suggest you read them. And unless you want to be shipped off to Iraq and be on the wrong side of a gun, I suggest you keep your comments to yourself.

Answer 9

It was proven time and time again. By Civil engineers http://www.civil.usyd.edu.au/wtc.shtml , by Investigative reporting http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/wtc/ , by the National Institute of Standards http://wtc.nist.gov/ and a host of others.

For most the research is enough. For Conspiracy theorists a hundred thousand studies and analysis of composites, materials, causation, heat and physics is all designed to "shut them up" and is dismissible.

You have proof, I am sorry if you "CHOOSE" not to accept it.

Answer 10

It was all Karl Roves master plan.

It was all Karl Roves master plan.

It was all Karl Roves master plan.

It was all Karl Roves master plan.

It was all Karl Roves master plan.

Repeat until indoctrination is complete.