human cloning should be banned?

Answer 1

Obviously it should be banned.

But can any one justify the reason ?

Answer 2

In my opinion no it shouldn't. Cloning is a significant step in a technology which could bring an end to disease and hunger (with the cloning of big stocked animals) and as for the human clones there have been many debates on wether or not they should or shouldnt exist but it is the same morality as artifical inteligence just because its flesh and blood doesnt make them any different they still should exist if we create it. And as for the soul we dont even know for sure if we have one but one thing we can do is dream of better things in the future and if anything can dream and hope then it has a right to live.

Answer 3

i do not see any reason it will be banned, if it helps the inhabitants as an finished, what's the difficulty. Why no longer provide those with incurable ailments of project at a healthy existence and if thats a thanks to do then so be it. so a strategies because the guy above who pronounced it may don't have any spirit "how did you comprehend that" you do not and also you should no longer only anticipate it does no longer. human beings pick to get all non secular and issues yet you comprehend what God gave us the skill to do this, then why could we no longer take advantage of it. If a figure would have their newborn for in common words one extra day because of a cloned human being's cells, do you imagine they could truly say no to that? NO Come on human beings, imagine of someone as well yourselves.

Answer 4

Human cloning should be banned...
Please note when you clone a person, that person must be born just like a normal baby, and grow just like a normal kid. Cloning DOES NOT create a instant double of a human.

Stem cell research(Wich your president is against) should continue, it could be the key to curing cancer.

Answer 5

Yes, at least in the form of cloning minds and/or "replacing" minds.

Think about it what if a killer brought back a clone of who she killed to declare her innocence...or if parents wanted to "retrain" their kids so they got rid of their kid and got an "untrained" clone?

It's basically playing "G-d" with the souls of human beings...sure you can translate the body but NOT the soul...that's where it becomes deadly.

I think cloning should be limited to body parts...that way someone's body parts could be cloned at young adulthood, for example, then reinstated at older age to improve mobility, for example. But far as cloning minds and such...that's just playing G-d with the spirtual level IE the soul...not a good idea.

Answer 6

For now, yes. It takes too many trials to produce a success -- and the failures are birth defects. Not acceptable in humans.

Answer 7

Same answer 3 times! OMG they all must be clones!!!

Answer 8

I think so. Come to think of the advantages and the disadvantages. You made a man to get its parts for us to remain healthy and live longer. So, if you will need a heart for heart transplant, will you kill that man and get his heart? And does it mean that science will become God? I'm not yet ready for that!

Answer 9

Agreed.

Answer 10

Yeah...