michaelsavage.com
2007-02-05 18:00:31 · 17 answers · asked by Sereny 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
michael savage is a moron.
2007-02-13 03:15:18 · answer #1 · answered by sydb1967 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Most likely I would vote for him. There are a few others who I would pick over him, but they probably won't run. We need somebody to shake up the political world. He would do that big time. I understand why he is so angre, just look at the insantity of both parties. Do you really feel they are representing us. They have done nothing good for America in 15 years.
Those of you who totally bash him, if you haven't listened to him, maybe you should for a day or two. Then decide. I listen a few hours each week on the way home from work. He has some extreme ideas, but at least he has ideas out side the little politically correct box everyone else is stuck in.
2007-02-10 06:59:35 · answer #2 · answered by Daniel B 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I am a conservative and I would consider him an embarassment. His whole schtick is is fine for talk radio, but his lack of self-control would be unnerving. When he started screaming to the caller on CNBC, "I hope you catch AIDS and die!," I thought he was a pretty unstable element. Could you imagine him greeting the King of Norway or the Prime Minister of Australia if he were in such a mood?
2007-02-05 18:10:07 · answer #3 · answered by Jesus Jones 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe - it would depend who else was running. I think it would be a mostly symbolic run, because he's smart enough to know that even the President can't unilaterally impose most of the measures he'd like to implement. But I'd love to see the campaign!
2007-02-05 18:07:06 · answer #4 · answered by dukefenton 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I trust Savage's perspectives on overseas coverage, immigration and a number of his monetary perspectives. regardless of the indisputable fact that, he's way off on quite a number of social subject matters. i ought to in hardship-free words vote for him in the journey that they decision grow to be a flat out socialist or him - he's a touch severe. regardless of the indisputable fact that, he'd probable do a better effective interest than Bush at present is. i'm prepared on his educate yet he has a tendency to flow off on tirades that flow on and on. I actual desire he comes out on proper which includes his regulation tournament antagonistic to the 17 November CAIF.
2016-12-03 19:05:28 · answer #5 · answered by klosterman 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I always vote for the lesser of two evils (or more), so it depends on who he is running against.
I couldn't vote for hillary or mccain over michal wiener.... so it would be a hard vote to cast... but i would vote for michael.
2007-02-05 18:05:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's a joke that's all about publicity. He would never do it because he won't win and he wouldn't divide the vote. I'd never vote for him because it would be divisive and basically a wasted vote, but he'd be a rocking Pres!!!!
2007-02-05 18:39:24 · answer #7 · answered by Nationalist 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would love for him to run for President. He could be the Ralph Nader of the Republican Party. Of course, I would never vote for him for President. I like my Presidents to be sane.
2007-02-06 15:45:17 · answer #8 · answered by Murray T 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes I would. However, the system is set up so that no one who would be a radical force could possibly win, so its a moot point. I would love to see him run, if only to get more publicity for his ideas.
2007-02-11 11:27:19 · answer #9 · answered by Big M 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If Hillery was on the other side anybody short of Osama gets my vote
2007-02-11 19:34:24 · answer #10 · answered by Boston Mark 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would vote for Michael Savage , our country would benefit. Now Obama on the other hand.....................
2007-02-11 02:03:33 · answer #11 · answered by yankeemyke 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋