He got federal income tax taken out of his paychecks monthly. The IRS decided he owed for 2004 and 2005 even after federal withholding. He made 51,000 a year. His house was appraised at 107,000 with a mortgage of 93,000 (balance is 78,000). he isn't willing to pay more taxes than his federal withholding. I agree with him, I'd refuse to pay for wars orchestrated by this government. Food on the table is more important.
The IRS gave notice of seizure on his property. He paid a few friends to burn the house down while he and my sister were on vacation (fire ruled accidental), and the insurance company paid off the balance of the house to the mortgage company (think he said he got some money too) before the IRS was able to legally "seize" the house.
He cleared out his bank accounts, has all vehicles registered in my name, and gets paid under the table doing sales and commission. He makes about 3 grand a month now.
Will he ever be able to buy a house again? IRS doesn't suspect foul play.
2007-02-05
17:41:50
·
5 answers
·
asked by
Vince Russo
3
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics
The fire was started because of some "faulty" electrical inside the home...this is what I heard.
He doesn't plan on rearing his head anytime soon. He has liquidated over 70,000 in assets and placed those in one of the relatives bank accounts. He is silently chunking away money in this bank account, and will continue to do so for years. He has essentially dissapeared under the radar.
He is no longer at his current or previous addresses. He has no recorded employment for the IRS to garnish the wages. Basically, he wants to buy a house, but may end up living with relatives or renting the rest of his life.
The IRS won't win this one. He only owes 8 grand in back taxes, penalties, and late fees.
2007-02-05
17:46:07 ·
update #1
He only protests the taxes because he owes even more than his federal withholding. He already paid his taxes each month from his paychecks. Now he finds out he owes even more when doing the filing via turbotax. The dunning notices start, and he simply refuses to fund these wars and invasions. A certain somebody has tried unsuccessfully to invade/rebuild two countries. Spending in excess of 1 trillion dollars for the attempt.
If you invest in a company who spends money with that reckless regard, would you want to invest any more money in it, or pull out right away?
They say tax protesters use the constitution (no income tax is defined in the constitution) as their basis. Federal courts shoot down this argument. Why? They are affiliated with the Government.
If he is smart, he will live with relatives or rent from a place that doesn't check credit (individual landlords who rent houses). He's got nearly 6 figures saved, and saving more under the table. He's good for a long time.
2007-02-05
18:03:32 ·
update #2
I fail to see where I assisted him. I had nothing to do with the house fire. I had nothing to do with helping him hide, or paying him under the radar. I simply know of his whereabouts, and I know of his ventures as of late. It is not a crime to know about someone's delinquent tax issues, nor someone's ways of depriving the IRS of property that the IRS plans to steal from the individual.
As for the 3 vehicles (all 2006 models), he gave them to me as gifts. I properly paid the gift tax on each car. He reimbursed me for the taxes and title fees. I fail to see how this is illegal. It was a legal gift transaction.
2007-02-05
18:10:22 ·
update #3