English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Does anybody realize that as part of the agreement that Iraq signed, should Saddam violate UN resolutions, that resumption of hostilities was an option? Do you STILL think that Bush "lied" us into this war? Are you a complete tool?

2007-02-05 16:17:36 · 3 answers · asked by imadumas 2 in Politics & Government Government

3 answers

This site may be helpful. I believe that the cease fire consisted of signing several "agreements". This link has more info:

http://www.nti.org/e_research/profiles/Iraq/index.html

2007-02-05 16:25:09 · answer #1 · answered by mirandawritz 1 · 0 0

Wow. What organization district is that? Presidnet George W. Bush prosecuted the warfare in Iraq for a volume of causes. the single such lots widley understand and least understood, ad to do with guns of Mass Destruction. maximum human beings trust that the concept change into once to go inot Iraq and hit upon vats of weaponized botulism or very virtually entire nuclear gadgets. the reality is a lengthy way a lot less concrete--Iraq had made consistent efforts to stymie inspections and had genuinely no longer supplied an entire accounitng of their WMD factors. There were such factors that were known to be in Iraq in 1992 and in 1998, by potential of 2002, the question change into once what had befell to those materails--what were destroyed and how, in which were they, might want to any of or no longer this is examined? Hussein had also given lots help and help to terrorists. we were engaged in Afghanistan for virtually a year and it change into once known that al Qaeda members were fleeing--likely the most unhazardous havens they were fleeing to change into once Iraq--in edge the invasionwa about denying those havens and struggling with help to different terror organizations as sturdy suhc as Hamas and Hezbollah.

2016-10-17 05:36:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes!! Read the UN Security Council Rules! It is against International Law to pre-emptively attack a country! You need a Security Council Resolution to launch any attack, and with reason, which we had none. We certainly were not being attacked! Bush bypassed the Council as he knew he would not get a resolution approved to attack Iraq, so he did it illegally!

Hussein had no weapons and most of what was in Bush's SOU in 2003 he knew to be false as it was taken out once! He was not a terrorist, and we knew it, he had nothing to do with 9/11 and Bush knew it!

Face it, Bush is a LIAR!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oN5yvoIsnnE

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/08/21/bush-on-911/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-HveMTLZ7dA&mode=related&search=




I don't think Bush Lied! I KNOW HE LIED!

2007-02-05 16:34:24 · answer #3 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers