Just wondering...
2007-02-05 16:06:24 · 23 answers · asked by ♠Gotham♠ 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No. The Supreme Court deciding the presidency was something we should not have accepted.
2007-02-05 16:14:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
I voted for him twice, he has turned cheek. He needs to take care of business on our own boarders. We are being invaded by Mexico and he acts like its no big deal. Wake up America.
2007-02-06 00:13:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He was elected by the procedure set forth in the Constitution of the United States, so the answer to your question is yes.
2007-02-06 00:13:07 · answer #3 · answered by msi_cord 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No he shouldn't have. Al Gore was the one that really won the election of 2000 and if he had, things would have been a lot better
2007-02-06 00:13:44 · answer #4 · answered by oh_how_the_mighty_have_fallen 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No the first time and No the second.
2007-02-06 00:16:11 · answer #5 · answered by GO HILLARY 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Look up the word Coup, and then google Florida election 2000, and Ohio election 2004.
2007-02-06 00:12:29 · answer #6 · answered by michaelsan 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
hec no but the american people voted for him. it is very creepy that al gore won the national vote and bush got through the door from the electoral vote.
2007-02-06 00:09:45 · answer #7 · answered by wedjb 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I stand behind him 100%
2007-02-06 00:15:25 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well he is now back to reality that's like asking if Clinton or carter should have been and the answer there is definitely a resounding"NO"...
2007-02-06 00:11:54 · answer #9 · answered by no one here gets out alive 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Kinda late there sweetheart !
2007-02-06 00:20:30 · answer #10 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋