Or is it Ford Expeditions and coal plants as usual?
http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/science/02/02/climate.change.report/index.html
http://www.ipcc.ch/
2007-02-05 15:13:09 · 9 answers · asked by buzzfeedbrenny 5 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
no,yep.
2007-02-05 15:15:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
so what energy source would you have us use to run our plants? hm did you know that the ford expedition is the cleanest large suv on the planet? what makes it definitive when there are plenty of scientists our there who do not believe global warming is a problem? is it because cnn says so? did you know that mitsubishi make an suv that is a PZEV vehicle? that is a Partial Zero Emissions Vehicle. also the ford fusion 4 cylinder is a PZEV vehicle. meaning that they produce less than one pound of green house gasses per hundred thousand miles. there is not a hybrid on earth that is a PZEV vehicle. hmm i ask should we ban these large suv's? what about familys liek my cousins, her and her husband have 7 kids. i think a 9 passenger expedition is better than taking 2 cars everywhere. what about the ford f250 and 350, these are very very large vehicles that are not even required to list the gas milage because it is so bad. but ranchers and many people in other lines of work need these vehicles to support their familys. and lastly the factories during the industrial revolution polluted much more than factories do today. mostly because of lack of technology and lack of laws.
2007-02-05 23:36:06 · answer #2 · answered by big_john_719 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well I'm just gona make a little correction by saying hybrid cars are considered ~0 emission, so that's probably why you don't see PZET(partial zero emission) label on them. Any hybrids will still get better mileage than non hybrid counter parts even if mpg figure don't come out to what they claim. Hybrids may not have huge immediate impact, but it does open up market for alternatives(not just gas powered cars) which is very big deal.
2007-02-05 23:45:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The people who care are not politicians. Denial will be the norm until it's too late to make relatively easy changes. As long as the big money people can keep making money by doing business as usual, that's the way it will be. Pretty sick, huh?
2007-02-05 23:27:40 · answer #4 · answered by Del C 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I care deeply,so deeply I have actually got tears to my eyes, thinking of the this planets destruction, in so many ways, mainly its the animals I am concerned about ,their survival is at stake.but I know theirs no way any one country can do anything about it, all the developing countrys will one day emit fifty times what we americans put out ,the planet as we know it is doomed
2007-02-05 23:29:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe, but no one knows if its 100 percent human cause, many think its just the Earth's cycle
2007-02-05 23:17:17 · answer #6 · answered by Dan 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes.more and more people are aware of global warming..and campaigns and programmes fighting against this disaster are mushrooming around the world.
2007-02-06 02:18:17 · answer #7 · answered by Von 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
will anybody care???? haha no because there are republicans like my uncle who want to convince everybody it's all cow farts and lightning.
And for all those people out there who want to believe it's not related to human beings and feel like my uncle does... I feel so terribly sorry for you.
2007-02-05 23:35:38 · answer #8 · answered by crisis 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Some people will, but will it make enough to stop people trashing the Earth, probably not.
2007-02-05 23:15:53 · answer #9 · answered by J R 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋