2007-02-05 15:09:31 · 13 answers · asked by sally sue 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
I doubt that is true. Tobacco has nicotine in it. It is addictive no matter what you do to it.
Don't start smoking and make sure not to vote for any representative that takes political contributions (bribes IMO) from tobacco companies. Especially if they talk about "life" and "values".
Tobacco companies are drug dealers and tobacco is a drug. A very addictive drug at that. Run, don't walk away from it and try to convince anyone you can to do the same!
I am a struggling ex-smoker. Smoking was the stupidest mistake of my life.
2007-02-05 15:16:49 · answer #1 · answered by reslstancelsfutlle 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
even as I really hate that tobacco organizations make huge salary on the rate of the wellness of the folk, socialism (as someone suggested above) in any type is unacceptable. to say that the authorities can scouse borrow funds it has no longer earned from a private corperation and redistribute it as they see in effective condition instruments an rather, very risky precident. besides... Do you actually imagine that tobacco organizations, or the different business business enterprise, will take a loss caused with assistance from the authorities? not in any respect! inspite of costs they incur, they are going to bypass on to the folk, so what you're really suggesting the following is that you want my taxes raised, and also you want your taxes raised, and also you want the taxes of the very human beings this law is purportedly designed to assist to be raised. If we favor to work out Tobacco organizations flushed down the tubes, we favor to step up efforts (WE the folk) to tutor and to assist those who're addicted get over that dependancy to cigarrettes and cigars. as well, this law ought to easily be one extra step contained in the upward thrust of authorities, back, greatest in route of socialism.
2016-11-02 10:54:58 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
im sure this goes with the government buisness.
nicotine of course is addicting, so im sure he is trying to make a plan of some sort or make an item which could contain it.
either that or he is trying to get people to buy more ciggarettes so the money will go to the government will get more cash so he can buy more things to do with the law.
2007-02-05 15:15:27 · answer #3 · answered by D3V!N 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I heard through the grapevine that it was to insure a stronger addiction so when he raised the taxes on the cigarettes again, the sales wouldn't drop.
2007-02-05 15:14:07 · answer #4 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Ok to one of the answers clinton didn't have his hands in everything... just his cigars...lol
back to this question...perhaps to kill us a bit more quickly...the faster we are gone the faster they get the smoke free america they want...and yet we do it willingly with a smile...while wishing we didn't have this damn addiction as it was.
2007-02-05 15:27:38 · answer #5 · answered by summera76 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
He knew that Laura C was dieing to ask a question about him on Yahoo! Answers. That's why he did it.
2007-02-05 15:12:35 · answer #6 · answered by Luekas 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bush has his hands in everything doesn't he? No wait that was Clinton.
2007-02-05 15:14:42 · answer #7 · answered by carolinatinpan 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Oh stop it.
There are plenty of legitimate reasons to point out the president's failings without making things up.
(also - if you're going to make things up, you could at least spell it correctly).
2007-02-05 15:13:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
cuz he's a f***ing f**get
y did we as america make him president???
but he wud probably be alot better then algore or kerry..
2007-02-05 15:18:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
He didn't. They have been doing it to get people more addicted.
2007-02-05 15:13:27 · answer #10 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋