it can be vetted,taxed and made safe for the girls without the drugs and diseases?
2007-02-05 14:04:34 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Yes, definitely. As you say their earnings could be taxed and in return, they could have a safe working environment, reducing the risk of attack and murder. Prostitution will never stop so it is better to make it safe.
2007-02-05 20:47:32 · answer #1 · answered by Catwhiskers 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not only that but the system is self regulatory and open to abuse, the Government should appoint a regulatory body to inspect and ensure the highest standards are met, this should be run by health care professionals specialising in sexual health and issues covering exploitation and drugs, I am available to help out also if my Queen and country need my QA standard but I will need a six figure salary, a car, a new house and a driver.
2007-02-06 03:58:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'll be surprised if Gordon Brown doesn't have this idea in his top ten of wheezes to fleece the British public. And, he could bring in his new tax retrospectively, as he usually does, so since all of us have been systematically screwed by him, perhaps he'll just find it easier to continue nicking the contents of our wallets which, regrettably, now contain only £25 and 1 condom (used but one careful owner).
2007-02-06 05:18:10 · answer #3 · answered by michael w 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Prostitution is already legal in England. However it is not legal to solicit in a public area, like a street or a park. That is why it is legal to post adds in phone booths over there.
2007-02-05 14:16:04 · answer #4 · answered by Killer Klingon 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, there would be more regulation. The government would make money off of it. The sex workers would be tested. The only drawback is that the names of people visiting prostitues would be kept somewhere and it's possible that those people could be blackmailed. However, if the names were kept confidential- it should work out well.
2007-02-05 14:13:02 · answer #5 · answered by M 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Lookit, I have been screwed, fxxxxd, and been paying for it for years, now that sounds like prostitution to me all in the name of the state.
Tony Blair and all his cronies have a lot to answer for, is that why the filth want to talk to him, he is in reality a prostitute?
2007-02-05 15:34:44 · answer #6 · answered by rinfrance 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes - in a properly controlled manner with licence to trade, health and safety and all the other requirements that apply to employed workers and self employed people.
2007-02-05 14:25:45 · answer #7 · answered by Jewel 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, if the criminal elements who promote drugs are being kept out of it.
2007-02-05 18:56:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes.
2007-02-05 21:01:09 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have argued those points in the US for years, but it falls upon deaf ears here. An added point: reduction of unemployment rate
2007-02-05 14:16:51 · answer #10 · answered by TQTX37A 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋