laughable.....when it came out he had an affair, i really couldnt care less.....
this move however turns my stomach because it is such an obvious manuever to escape responsibility.......newsome, you are a loser. no wonder your wife left you for a career on court tv
2007-02-05 13:53:55 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Illicit affairs must be investigated and the culprit must be punished.
2007-02-09 07:24:52 · answer #1 · answered by Joan 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
shouldn't his own affairs (No pun meant) proceed to be his very own? i think of that's employer that would desire to proceed to be between the events in touch. comparable element with the Clinton administration and each and all of the pains and comments and overspending and airborne dirt and dust-slinging that went on there. i think of the money being spent on prosecuting philandering politicians may well be extra appropriate spent on feeding the homeless or helping the single mom with 3 little ones get a respectable education. My thinking is that this... a million. What he does exterior the workplace is his employer. 2. to purpose to hold a flesh presser to a extra robust ethical familiar than the final public is absurd in my opinion. 3. that's not proper that they are liberal, democrat, conservative, or republican. they're all politicians and for this reason can't be relied on. 4. In connection with #a million, that's none of our employer.
2016-12-17 10:21:39 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is a standard formula Leftists have worked out. When one of their own commits a heinous act, they need only go through a certain ritual to be considered 'okay' again. The Hollywood crowd does this all the time too.
I say, if a person's character has not changed, no rituals will convince me they are worthy of trust.
2007-02-05 13:57:25 · answer #3 · answered by speakeasy 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
This isn't just a formula for "leftists" -- remember the Foley scandal? Despite that Fox News actually labeled him as a Democrat in one report, he really is/was a Republican. Pretty much everyone in the spotlight sees this as a get-out-of-scandal-free card, and it shouldn't be.
However, in the end, what matters to me is how big a scandal it was. Like you, I couldn't care less what the mayor of SF did, as long as he wasn't making political decisions based on it.
2007-02-05 14:00:45 · answer #4 · answered by Vaughn 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I understand that the citizens of San Fran are outraged. Not because he had an affair, but because he had an affair with a WOMAN!
2007-02-05 15:12:24 · answer #5 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Newsome's a creep. This is just another excuse for his behavior.
Wonder who's going to be next?
2007-02-05 13:59:33 · answer #6 · answered by Dizney 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm really fed-up with the hole situation of rehab. I hate my job is there a rehab for that?
2007-02-05 14:03:37 · answer #7 · answered by Monika C 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
rehab for bad manners, rehab for addiction (oh and let go for photo ops), rehab for sexual satisfaction.
Crap.......now I have to PROBABLY enter rehab for my computer addiction that is hyped by the chocolate I do on the side. Jesus!
2007-02-05 14:00:28 · answer #8 · answered by sqwirlsgirl 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
hey speakeasy....i see you chose to ignore the fact dumbya is an admitted drunk, and now uses the bible as a means of swaying voters to stomach his lies.
2007-02-05 14:06:57 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Illicit affairs must be investigated and the culprit must be punished.
2007-02-05 13:57:20 · answer #10 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋