please respond with more then "the knight" or "samurai," I want to know your reason why. Also, they start out on top of a horse, your choice of armour (keep it realistic though). Terrain would be a flat plain, and one on one combat as well as 100 on 100 combat.
2007-02-05 13:34:23 · 9 answers · asked by Chase 5 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
just to let you know, these guys would be top knotch fighters.
2007-02-05 13:55:54 · update #1
Samurai, they had way more training with their swords and they were quite agile. The knights it would be hard for them to move and the Samurai would be all over the place. If they started on a horse then the samurai could stand up and jump off the horse while slashing his blade.... Yep smells like a babbling brook with a hint of lemon
2007-02-05 13:39:00 · answer #1 · answered by Theoretically Speaking 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hmmm Very exciting question. the reply ought to lie in additional options. As suggested above. they're 2 diverse sorts of combating. If the knight is in completely conflict armor, fastened on a horse perchance. The knight doesnt bypass very quickly (Weight regulations) The Samurai is extra cellular and agile. The Knights sword is heavier than the Samurai. Samurai for the most section even with the actuality that did not empoy Ninjas as they were considered below honorable. the reason that there are not any recorded battles change into because Japan change into merely in touch with Japan (and China) that they had no problem for Europe which they idea were finished of uncivilized human beings. immediately up in a good matchup i ought to ought to bypass with the Knight merely via Armor and heavier sword. it should be close because the Samurai has speed and agility and no worry of lack of existence.
2016-11-02 10:39:58 · answer #2 · answered by santolucito 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A late period Knight (say 1600's or so) would win. His armour would be all but impervious to the Samurai. (Knights tended to be felled by maces...which can crush and break things...not by swords, which do not make it though the armour by that period in time) Furthermore, the Charge of the Knights horse (which also wore plate armour) and his lace, into the Samurai's chest, would likely kill the Samurai right off the bat.
2007-02-07 10:49:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
With both sporting original equipment, the knight because his armament was made of steel while the samurai's was made of bamboo. It wasn't until they started trading with the west that they got steel. Also if cavalry was employed, the Samurai's light mount wouldn't stand a chance against the heavy charger of the knight.
2007-02-05 13:41:57 · answer #4 · answered by Sophist 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well...I'd say a knight...no matter how cool or skilled a samurai is...armor was made for swords to NOT go through...so I think a knight would win in all of those situations.
2007-02-05 13:44:12 · answer #5 · answered by booda2009 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A samurai & a knight are two cool characters! They have special weapons and armors. But, as always, the match depends on the player's character and their skills...
2007-02-05 13:48:55 · answer #6 · answered by D1 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends if I'll play the Samurai, Samurai will win but if I'll play the Knight, the Knight will win. :o)... and if you'll play me, you'll always win. :oD
2007-02-05 13:42:16 · answer #7 · answered by wacky_racer 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Samurai. cause he knows more moves then a knight would.
2007-02-05 13:48:10 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
samurai
2007-02-05 13:41:50 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋