2007-02-05 13:27:03 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
Well Hewitt was giving her a portion on a regular basis around that time. You dont need to be Sherlock frickin Holmes to work it out
2007-02-05 13:38:21 · update #1
What ever happened to the old saying "don't speak ill of the dead". Shame on you. You must be a complete idiot if you think for a second that the Establishment would tolerate an impostor as third in line to the Throne. Do you think they just arrived on the banana boat?
2007-02-06 05:20:27 · answer #1 · answered by Raymo 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Just because he has reddish hair doesn't mean that James Hewitt is his father.
Are you not aware that there is a red hair gene somewhere in both Charles & Diana's family?Also, are you unaware of how hurtful all these rumours are for Harry?
2007-02-06 13:56:48 · answer #2 · answered by monkeyface 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Prince Harry is most definitely Charles's son. The relationship between Diana and James Hewitt began innocently and then escalated during 1986. Hewitt was helping her conquer a fear of horses, she'd fallen one at a young age. Since the royals are horse enthusists, it was difficult for her to not be able to ride. It is well known that the queen knows all of the names and other vitals of all of her horses. Their relationship began two years after Harry was born. And it's true, Diana's brother Charles has red hair. Also if you look at pictures of Princess Anne from 15 yrs ago, her hair was a mixture of brown and red tones. Harry is not James's son.
2007-02-06 01:17:49 · answer #3 · answered by Danielle P 2 · 4⤊ 2⤋
WILL YOU PLEASE STOP ASKING THIS QUESTION??? It's been asked so many times it gets boring to even look at. If you really LOOK at Harry and then at Charles you will note that even though Harry has red hair, he actually shares Charles' facial features. And if you look at William, depending on the light and his position, you'll see that his hair colour is not blonde, but has faint reddish streaks in it. Only when he has been in the sun does his hair becomes lighter like Diana's. So there is a red hair gene on both sides.
2007-02-07 07:26:14 · answer #4 · answered by Blodeuedd 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's the biggest cover up in history, yet the most pointless. It is so obvious. Harry knows, William knows, Charles knows, the Queen knows and Hewitt certainly knows. Unfortunately, the British media is a powerful tool and is capable of convincing many gullible fools that black is white.
2007-02-06 23:33:15 · answer #5 · answered by Gerbil 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
He does but, on the other hand, he could well get his red hair from the Spencer family. He is also the dead spit (in profile) to Edward Vlll, later Duke of Windsor.
2007-02-07 11:56:08 · answer #6 · answered by Beau Brummell 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Comeon Prince Harry does not look like James Hewitt in any way
2007-02-05 21:34:09 · answer #7 · answered by Hienekens J 1 · 5⤊ 4⤋
yes he does look a bit like him(more than he looks like charles)but he looks a lot like dianas side of the family too.so its probley just our minds working overtime!and william is changing as hes getting older,his hairs receeding like his dads.and hes got the royal protuding nashers lol
2007-02-06 05:59:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Been said many times,it must be admitted that he does look a lot like his dad,he even joined his old regiment!
2007-02-06 16:07:30 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's a conspiricy. Let Diana rest in peace. Forget about rumors/rumours. Don't waste your time.
2007-02-05 21:30:03 · answer #10 · answered by WhatAmI? 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋