2007-02-05 13:24:37 · 18 answers · asked by Travis 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes I would definitely vote for Michael Savage. He represents honesty in his values and is a patroit. Even if you do not agree with all his views he isn't swayed to the left or to the right. He believes in this great country and would protect it at any cost. He upholds the constitution as if one of the founding fathers was listening over his shoulder. He doesn't bend it to suit his political objective like so many left wing hacks do today. If anyone believes in the soveriegnty of this country Michael Savage is your choice
2007-02-09 06:57:03 · answer #1 · answered by taplin_02 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, any man who would send his dog away just because the dog is getting old is a man I don't trust. In 2001 a retired Marine Colonel told me he thinks Savage is a fraud, and is really a left wing plant who is trying to make the right look insane. At the time I did not agree, but now I suspect my Marine friend is right. I have seen too many inconsistencies in Savage's assertions to believe he is sincere.
Real conservatives don't throw away their dogs. Liberals dispose of anything that becomes inconvenient, like fetuses and Vince Foster, and Mary Jo Kopechne, the woman who drowned in Ted Kennedy's car...
2007-02-06 10:01:39 · answer #2 · answered by mountainclass 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You're kidding right? I wouldn't vote Savage to be the chief dog catcher. Sorry he's a right wing extremist, he wouldn't get my vote in a million years.
2007-02-05 21:50:24 · answer #3 · answered by Third Uncle 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would rather vote for Randy Macho Man Savage
2007-02-05 21:51:33 · answer #4 · answered by mrlebowski99 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would vote for Fred Savage.
2007-02-05 21:27:08 · answer #5 · answered by kimmys 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
mike savage is a genius, pure and simple. He would turn this country it the best direction it could go it. The people have been screaming for years, CLOSE THE BORDER!
2007-02-08 10:46:16 · answer #6 · answered by aaron t 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Anybody that wouldn't vote for him is an idiot. You don't know that you are an idiot because you are an idiot. He would be the absolute smartest president ever. If you argue with this, you either have a mental illness or you are really stupid, so ask your self if you are one of these two.
2007-02-07 21:15:54 · answer #7 · answered by Philip W 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. He is a media personality, but he has no political experience. Even Ronald Reagan was Governor of California before he was elected President.
2007-02-05 21:30:41 · answer #8 · answered by KCBA 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Oh my, that is almost as scary as Hillary Clinton for president. He is a screamer and I don't think of that as a presidential quality. Also, some of the stuff he says is just plain wrong.
2007-02-05 21:27:45 · answer #9 · answered by fishingbabe8 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, because he's a far right kook, in the vein of Bill O'Leilly.
Check this link out - it says it all about him;
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=03/07/08/1510241
2007-02-05 21:29:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋