Well, i have been thinking, if we may establish that a generation is made up with people who have been born in a 5 years period. Then those who aren´t a part of the media during their generation must be, only those in charge to keep communication between generations.
Don´t be shy, just say what you think, plez
2007-02-05 12:56:12 · 10 answers · asked by Metzikat 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
To re punctuate: Well, i have been thinking. If we may establish that a generation is made up of people who have been born in a 5 year duration. Then those who aren't a part of the media during their generation must be the people to be in charge to maintain communication between each generation.
That would mean that ten year olds would teach five year olds and 15 year olds would teach ten year olds and so on. Not a bad idea.
2007-02-05 13:30:05 · answer #1 · answered by Psyengine 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There will be one person in each generation(consisting 30 years) that will keep the communication in between generations. This is one who is born on the 6th period of the generation consisting 5-year term each.This is the person who is not part of the media, how can he indeed when he can't possibly interact with anyone by communication, he can't talk a at the age of 0, nor can he understand the concept of communication..
Therefore out of the 6 people born in every generation, one of them will keep in charge keeping the communication going and passing it on to the next generation . And the cycle goes.
2007-02-10 23:18:53 · answer #2 · answered by oscar c 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ah..I get it..because 20 years creates too large of a gen. gap? Nice idea! AND people of each 5 year generation could relate better in terms of music and cartoons also!!!
2007-02-05 13:17:36 · answer #3 · answered by katiebug 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not sure what you're asking, but for starters, a generation is 20 years, not five. What is your theory about communication?
2007-02-05 13:10:33 · answer #4 · answered by Alex 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Based on the placement of the question mark, your question appears to be whether or not you have a theory. Based on the paragraph after this, I would have to say, no, you don't have a theory.
2007-02-11 11:35:53 · answer #5 · answered by Bob 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good question! May I have another?
2007-02-13 06:52:34 · answer #6 · answered by Harry 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
can you rephrase that?
I'm not sure if it is your sentence structure or it just didn't make sense, but i didn't understand a single bit of that
(no offense though)
2007-02-05 13:04:04 · answer #7 · answered by Eng 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i can't answer you theory iff you don't have a ? for me to anwser What is your ? you want to ask me?
2007-02-12 07:50:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
stop thinking!
2007-02-12 10:19:15 · answer #9 · answered by SANDI P 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
QUACK
2007-02-11 04:52:21 · answer #10 · answered by ashkicker420 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋