English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

“Were the Texans justified in fighting to break away from Mexico? Was their fight for independence right or wrong?”

2007-02-05 12:17:28 · 5 answers · asked by machellaray93@sbcglobal.net 1 in Arts & Humanities History

5 answers

The Battle of the Alamo was a 19th-century battle between the Republic of Mexico and the rebel Texian forces, including Tejanos, during the latter's fight for independence — the Texas Revolution.
The Texas Revolution or Texas War of Independence was fought from October 2, 1835 to April 21, 1836 between Mexico and the Tejas portion of the Mexican state of Coahuila y Tejas.

Animosity between the Mexican government and the American settlers in Texas (who were called Texians) began with the Siete Leyes of 1835, when Mexican President and General Antonio López de Santa Anna Pérez de Lebrón abolished the Constitution of 1824 and proclaimed a new anti-federalist constitution in its place. Unrest soon followed throughout all of Mexico, and war began in Texas on October 1, 1835, with the Battle of Gonzales. Early Texian success at La Bahia and San Antonio were soon met with crushing defeat at the same locations a few months later. Soon after, a Texian fort was overrun, and most of the defenders were killed in the Battle of the Alamo.

The war ended at the Battle of San Jacinto (about 20 miles (32 km) east of modern day Houston) where General Sam Houston led the Texas Army to victory over a portion of the Mexican Army under Santa Anna, who was captured shortly after the battle. The conclusion of the war resulted in the creation of the Republic of Texas. The Republic was never recognized by the government of Mexico, and during its brief existence, it teetered between collapse and invasion from Mexico. Texas was annexed by the United States of America in 1845, and it was not until the Mexican-American War that the "Texan Question" was resolved.
Texians were becoming increasingly disillusioned with the Mexican government. Many of the Mexican soldiers garrisoned in Texas were convicted criminals who were given the choice of prison or serving in the army in Texas. Many Texians were also unhappy with the location of their state capital, which moved periodically between Saltillo and Monclova, both of which were in southern Coahuila, some 500 miles (800 km) away; they wanted Texas to be a separate state from Coahuila (but not independent from Mexico) and to have its own capital. They believed a closer location for the capital would help to stem corruption and facilitate other matters of government. Some citizens were accustomed to the rights they had in the U.S. that they did not have in Mexico. For example, Mexico did not protect Freedom of Religion, instead requiring colonists to pledge their acceptance of Roman Catholicism. Unlike in the states of the Southern United States where slavery was legal, the status of slaves in Mexico was ambiguous. Although Mexico had officially outlawed slavery, the government was widely tolerant of the holding of slaves, but not their sale. Slave traders were thus unhappy with the limitations imposed upon them. Although these many issues caused friction, they were not sufficient to incite the settlers to revolt as a whole.
The Mexican–American War, also usually known in the United States as The Mexican War and in Mexico as la intervención norteamericana (the North American Intervention) or la guerra del 47 (the War of '47), was a military conflict fought between the United States and Mexico from 1846 to 1848, in the wake of the 1845 U.S. annexation of Texas. Mexico had not recognized the secession of Texas in 1836 and announced its intention to take back what it considered a rebel province.

2007-02-05 12:35:30 · answer #1 · answered by cubcowboysgirl 5 · 0 0

The Texans at the Alamo were asking that the government of Mexico honor the constitution it made it 1824, That is why the flag that flew above it was a Mexican flag with the year 1824 on it. They had not declared independence yet and just wanted representation in the Mexican government of the dictator Santa Ana.

Modern revisionists have invented a slave story to try and shame the Texans, but look at the number of Slaves in Texas at the time, There were NO large plantations for them to work on. There were NO large cities for them to be sold at or ways to get the necessary equipment in which to make slavery a profitable business in Texas. The Defenders of the Alamo just wanted the Government to allow them to be free citizens of Mexico.

2007-02-05 12:34:32 · answer #2 · answered by Willie 4 · 0 0

I stay merely south of San Antonio Texas . What the daughters of the Alamo have finished to make a screw up the area is impressive. once you bypass to work out the conflict grounds there is no longer something to work out yet lawns and plant existence each and every the position. no longer something like the historic Alamo might want to look as if. The fake one outfitted at Brackettville is relaxing to bypass to inspite of if it change right into a movie set. once you look up the authentic causes Bowie and Crockett were on the Alamo contained in the first position you gained't like them a lot. Houston change right into a boastful below the impression of alcohol.

2016-11-02 10:31:05 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Well, they rebelled mainly because they brought their slaves along when they settled and Mexico outlawed slavery. So their fight for independence was for a horrible reason.

2007-02-05 12:22:51 · answer #4 · answered by someone 3 · 0 1

Depends which side of the Rio Grande your on amigo.

2007-02-05 12:26:39 · answer #5 · answered by stevemxusa 6 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers