We all know that pretentious flaunting of wealth is a common Redpublican trait. Would they just die if they could not wear their Mink and Ermin coats???
2007-02-05 11:55:04 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
You hit the nail on this one. Global Warming is a direct challenge to a lifestyle of plunder. Rob from everybody and keep everything is the conservative motto, and to suggest we might be killing the planet or the future of life on the earth is just too much to bear and continue on as before. That we need to act responsibly about the earth would require a complete overhaul of the Republican paradigm that there is not enough to go around, and that to the victor goes the spoils, and they will hear nothing of it. Well done 43!
2007-02-05 12:00:37 · answer #1 · answered by michaelsan 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
till you reside interior the Artic circle on a examine station, or in Siberia or yet another section with extreme chilly climate that synthetics do not artwork ok or are actually not obtainable, donning fur only is easy incorrect, each time the fur is won in basic terms by the death of an animal. donning outfits that instruct off animal fur encourages the killing of all plant existence and fauna which could be utilized for fur. whether you place on rabbit fur, which isn't endangered, it makes different individuals opt to have some thing they think approximately "extra sensible" so as that they are able to one-up you. The extra this stupidity occurs, the extra the animal's coats are worth. The extra an animal's fur expenditures, the extra probable poaching and destruction of plant existence and fauna will take place. think of roughly it. Do you definitely need the fur peeled off the carcass of a few undesirable creature who grew to become into probable killed in a merciless way,and could not additionally be ineffective yet while skinned, with out regard for any offspring that would desire to be based on that animal (the hunters many times only go away with the hides and then the cubs starve to death.) purchase some thing else that exhibits you're above the might desire to instruct off by donning fur, which only seems disgusting besides, and allow the worldwide see you're a extra sensible guy or woman than that. BTW, sheep and goats have fur that's harvested with out harming or killing the animal.
2016-09-28 11:36:55 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I think it is just hopeful thinking because if it is true that the sea level could raise 2' in the next 50 years, the mid west will turn into the great mid west bay off of the enlarged Gulf of Mexico
2007-02-05 12:03:20 · answer #3 · answered by Kerry R 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I see more liberal demotwits wearing furs than republicans.
fur=murder. Not even close. Vain & tacky maybe, but it is not murder. Nor is eating a hamburger or wearing leather shoes.
2007-02-05 12:40:36 · answer #4 · answered by RockHunter 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hard to fear something that doesn't exist. I wish that I had wealth to flaunt. I'd be happy to fulfill that stereotype of a Republican.
2007-02-05 11:58:33 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
you should get back on the "short bus" that brought you here. Perhaps there are others with your lackluster mentality to talk to about meaningless dribble.
2007-02-05 12:21:43 · answer #6 · answered by Mon-chu' 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Lol. Well they most likely were bought on credit so they would like to get their moneys worth.
2007-02-05 11:58:01 · answer #7 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
fur is murder!!!
2007-02-05 12:31:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋