Which was the World most treacherous Spy agency. Old Communist KGB or the Bush Cheney web of terror???

Answer 1

The KGB has fallen, that leaves the Bush/Cheney web of terror. It has spread terror across the globe.

Answer 2

I know you're being facetious, but at the same time you strike me as being somewhat knowledgeable. When Sun Tzu wrote ' The Art Of War ' he unabashedly put a high premium on spies. Holy Writ speaks of the two spies who went to Jericho.
Today, it's a different story, isn't it? A much larger, infinitely more populous world than the one those men knew. Everything seems to interlock and intertwine in one way or another. If you watch Robert Redford in ' Three Days Of The Condor ' the murky ethics of the half world of spies comes to a head, at the end. Max Von Sydow, impressed with the younger man tries to ( softly ) recruit him saying;

" No need to take sides. "

We're at a defining point in history much as the French court in the early 18th Century was. The administration had grown antiquated and puny to govern so large a people.

So too the governments of the world. In effect, the operative, really, now calls the tune as theirs is the best quick fix. This, propounds a palpable dive in quality of life. We live like the Cubans now. Vast, armed, national camps to protect both a single leaders and their entourages. All that is missing, are the redundant, bombastic, mind numbing party slogans and even those surface in one way or another. My feeling is a field agent of any kind is vastly overrated. Given the extant technology and the existence of Cryptographers. ( Sp? ) Treachery. Good choice of words. Common currency in a world where lies are common coin. Is this really a service? Do we really need this? World wide? Has it ever stopped involvement in wars and actually promoted understanding? Or fear, paranoia, government overshadowing and enslavement. I'm with you. It deserves a searing, scrutinizing treatment. World wide.

Answer 3

Neither. I think people that try to run a monopoly online is the closets to a web of terror by hacking servers, and cyberstalking individuals.

Answer 4

You have demonstrated a complete lack of understanding of what is going on in the world right now. Work on your knowledge and facts before writing cheap shots.

Answer 5

Bush and Cheney warrant-less wiretaps in collusion with a trip to Gitmo.

Answer 6

Why does he need a spy agency? He gets such excellent intelligence from the democrats!

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." - President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998.

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998.

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." - Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998.

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999.

"There is no doubt that... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, Dec, 5, 2001.

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them."
Sen. Carl Levin (d, MI), Sept. 19, 2002.

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is using and developing weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002.

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002.

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force — if necessary — to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002.

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years . We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Jay Rockerfeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002,

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do."
Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002.

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction. "[W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation. And now he has continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ...
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003.