Why do they not hold him accountable?
When he had 5 chances to kill Bin Laden, and took niehter of them?
And also how he refused to take action against Al Qaeda groups after we were attacked 4 times?
(-WTC, 2 U.S embassy attacks, and the U.S.S Cole)
Why does Clinton get a free pass when it was his ignorance of terror groups starting in the middle east that led led to 9/11?
Some people will follow Clinton to the grave.
2007-02-05 10:23:23 · 12 answers · asked by Mcbob92 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
to answer your question, because it would make him look bad.
however, I do agree with some of the posters that say that he was not responsible for the bulk of the blame.
our system failed us in regards to 9/11, they were unprepared for it, and frankly were operating under a false sense of security that was in place largely through ignorance and foolishness. just because we do not have a hostile nation near our borders, and because we have never had anything of that scale happen before, people assumed we were safe. the public does not want to think that attacks like this could happen here, and that under the old system, there would be almost nothing we could do to stop them.
lack of cooperation between our intelligence forces, lack of concern by our government, and hatred of us by our enemies all lead to this, no one person our group can take soul blame for why it happened other than those who carried it out.
2007-02-05 10:53:03 · answer #1 · answered by chris r 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He did attempt to get OBL and others. There were chances but they backed off for various reasons. Clinton and his crew do share some resonsibility-- not the bulk of it.
9/11 happend on Bush's watch, no Clinton's. Had Bush et. al. listed to the chatter and intel that Al Qaeda planned 9/11 style attacks, maybe they could have been prevented.
2007-02-05 10:31:39 · answer #2 · answered by dapixelator 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If President Clinton did kill Bin Laden,would 9/11 not have happened? Who can say?
Your arrogance in blaming President Clinton for 9/11, does not explain our Kids dying in Iraq.
2007-02-05 10:58:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sandy Berger had orders from powerful people, who thought Clinton was involved in 9/11, to destroy secret documents.
Berger got caught stealing and destroying National Secrets to protect Clinton from the 9/11 Commission Investigation.
Looks like it worked.
2007-02-05 10:29:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
First off, he did make attempts to kill OBL and he did take actions against Al Qaeda.
Secondly, do you blame Bush I for the first WTC attack? It did happen only 38 days into Clinton's presidency.
2007-02-05 10:28:58 · answer #5 · answered by Take it from Toby 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
9/11 became into the teraists fault. and you may try accountable Bush for typhoon Katrina, yet i do no longer think of he has that a lot warm air. Ya I suspose Bush is the guy who began typhoon katrina. No actualy i began out typhoon Katrina. I blew and blew and blew and blew I blew sooooooo puzzling and what do you be attentive to I created Huricane Katrina. :D
2016-10-01 11:45:35 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because they are blinded by their hatred of George Bush. The truth is the Democrats are as disingenuous and phony as they can possibly be double standards are a prerequisite for joining the party in the first place.
2007-02-05 10:32:59 · answer #7 · answered by crawler 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Clinton was a wimp, but advisors have to take some blame and
the general ignorant public voicing their uninformed opinion.
2007-02-05 10:34:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Clinton's apathy when dealing with terrorism does not make 9/11 his fault.
Al Qaeda is at fault.. nobody else.
2007-02-05 10:27:09 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Try governing the Western Hemisphere while getting a b.j. in the w.h.
Whoooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!
2007-02-05 10:32:44 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋