he starts WW3 that causes a nuclear holocaust in Israel anyway (as well as the world)?
Instead of just one country getting wiped off the face of the earth Bush would be wiping all the countries off the world off the face of the earth. That sure is one way to win the war on terror. To bad no one will be around to celebrate the victory.
2007-02-05 09:23:32 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Actually wouldn't be funny at all...'cos if he does attack Iran,this is what i sgoin gto happen...another world war would start...and probably th epeople left won't hav enothing to celebrate about...
"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones." Albert Einstein
2007-02-05 18:37:57 · answer #1 · answered by Tinkerbell05 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There's nothing funny about that, or the threat of a nuclear holocaust. It's sad that you find it funny to bag on Bush using these statements and not really realizing that this is a reality and not some stupid statement to further increase your Liberal agenda. This is all just entertainment to you. You will sit back and think about how bad it could make Bush look. But in reality, it makes you look bad for using it as entertainment purposes when there are millions and millions of people's lives at sake. Pathetic on your part if you ask me.
2007-02-05 18:07:26 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It won't be Bush, he'll be out of office before we're forced to deal with Iran.
It won't be to protect Israel, it will be to protect ourselves. Remember that the Iranians have a stated national goal of "Death to America"
It wouldn't "wipe every country off the face of the world" because it would take Iran decades to be able to produce enough nukes to do that.
Think for a change.
2007-02-05 18:13:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Even if this administration were to attack Iran it would only do so by air and strike strategical targets (most likely believed nuclear facilities).I would highly doubt it would cause any nation to drop a Nuke on Israel. It may indeed cause WWIII, but nuclear war will not begin.
2007-02-05 17:29:21 · answer #4 · answered by apple juice 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
would it be funny? don't think so despite all things Bush would not be that mad to unlease a nuclear holocaust.
2007-02-05 17:33:21 · answer #5 · answered by cormucus 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Wow, it is true that libs look at the world through bleak glasses. That is not very funny.
2007-02-05 17:33:49 · answer #6 · answered by mountaindew25 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
You are so wrong it would take more space than they allow here to set you straight.
2007-02-05 17:39:23 · answer #7 · answered by notyou311 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You have a very pathetic sense of humor.
Yeah, world destruction - what a hoot.
2007-02-05 17:26:02 · answer #8 · answered by Jadis 6 · 8⤊ 0⤋
it would be funny to all the people who have been saying that bush would do it. until they got vaporized that is.
2007-02-05 17:27:24 · answer #9 · answered by paul 5 · 6⤊ 0⤋
Uh, holocausts aren't really funny.........grow up.
2007-02-05 17:51:53 · answer #10 · answered by VoodooPunk 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋