2007-02-05 09:13:39 · 7 answers · asked by wemage53 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Since we have spent over 1/2 TRILLION dollars in Iraq, given tax cuts to the wealthy, Bush suggests cutting medical programs for children, the disabled and the elderly. He goes after the recipients, but won't touch the FAT COW HMO's who pay their presidents millions in salary, millions in bonus, millions in perks and golden parachutes, while they pay investors and make their money by seeing how many medical services they can deny!
Iraq is another issue! The lame brain idiot in the white house started it illegally, with NO justification as they had NOTHING to do with 9/11 or terrorist, and we have killed in the 100's of thousands of them. Even if the Geneva Conventions demands our taking care of them, which we have never done, we should no it on moral grounds that this president seems to have none of!
2007-02-05 09:24:31 · answer #1 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are all important. Senior citizens are our living history. They have fascinating stories to tell us. In the past, this was how stories and important legends were handed down, and their wisdom was considered sacred. The disabled are also important. Being disabled does not make one a second class citizen. Muslims, whether they be Iraqi, American, Pakistani, or Martian are also important. We are all people, folks!! Everyone has something to contribute in their own way.
2007-02-05 10:19:01 · answer #2 · answered by Chris S 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Americans!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Iraqi's and others of the worlds inept masses need to take care of themselves!!Bush is asking for 140 billion for Iraq? you could give health care to everyone in the US for that amount? why do they deserve or have claim to that amount of taxcpayers dollars? wake up America!
2007-02-05 09:20:37 · answer #3 · answered by richard c 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who cares? It's all about youth in America...I wish the baby boomers would all quit their whining and complaining! They raised the youth running this country (20-35 year olds) and now they are reaping what their hippie morals have sown. So shut up already.
2007-02-05 09:18:56 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
From who's perspective should I answer this question?
2007-02-05 09:20:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Aren't they all people? No person's intrinsic value is greater than any other person's.
2007-02-05 09:17:16 · answer #6 · answered by theearlybirdy 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
this will tell you the answer
http://rds.yahoo.com/_ylt=A9gnMiCcqMdFFjYBsT6jzbkF;_ylu=X3oDMTBsMW5yM3VoBHNlYwNwcm9mBHZ0aWQDSTA2Nl84OA--/SIG=12vas19gd/EXP=1170799132/**http%3A//flatrock.org.nz/topics/money_politics_law/assets/hillary_clinton.jpg
2007-02-05 09:17:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋