The fans pay good money to see the game and tehy have to sit in the rain, better off having it in domes stadiums where they are no chances of weather spoiling the game, especailly for the Super Bowl, considering alot is inolved for this game. Entertainment, fans, players, media,
plus I was tired of seeing the camera fog up off and on and rain drops on it.
2007-02-05 08:52:28 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football (American)
No. It's football for a reason. I could care less how much fans paid. That was their decision to fork money over to see their team; they know that the weather is no guarantee. It's just amazing that out of 41 Super Bowls, this was the first real downpour throughout the whole game. I agree that the rain definitely affected the cameras.
2007-02-05 17:27:20 · answer #1 · answered by RichMac82 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Real football fans could care less about the weather. Did you ever see the fans fill Lambeau Field in 67 to see the Packers defeat the Cowboys when it was -13 degrees with a wind chill making it feel like -50 degrees? Football is about survival of the fittess and not about media entertainment which they have made it out to be. I have to watch the Falcons play in a dome but I prefer the game to be outside regardless of the weather.
2007-02-05 09:11:25 · answer #2 · answered by toughguy2 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It makes sence for the weather, however, as far as entertainment and the noise it could be horrible. Imaginge how much louder the superbowl is than normal games, with all that noise bouncing off the walls. What a headache. It would be any better to watch or hear for that matter.
Plus, all the entertaiment and major fireworks would be cut down to a minimum because of the enclosed area.
2007-02-05 08:59:24 · answer #3 · answered by CaliGirlRach7 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont beleive that you should, becasue a) you would be taking possible money away from cities with open field stadiums, and b) weather is a part of the game. Teams that play in a dome are kind of spoiled, since they are used to perfect conditions almost.
2007-02-05 08:57:16 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's football. The weather is part of the game. There should actually be NO domed stadiums at all, ever in the NFL.
2007-02-05 08:59:25 · answer #5 · answered by ndmagicman 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The more challenging a game is for the players, the better it is for the viewers. I think if the weather is a little soggy it makes for a better game. There's little room for error and it's that much harder to get the upper hand.
2007-02-05 09:03:37 · answer #6 · answered by Polamalu is God 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh Hell yes...I was dissapointed!!! I agree 100% No one looked like they were enjoying it, not even the players, the camera fogged up, blurry, water logged...the player could have peed in thier pants and none the wiser were we. And Prince got his hair wet too.
2007-02-05 11:37:08 · answer #7 · answered by steelgal 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, They Should because people paygood money to see a game and they want to leave because they will be soaked.
2007-02-05 10:16:30 · answer #8 · answered by Jacob R 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that when it rains, it makes the game more exciting and more fun to watch.
2007-02-05 09:00:45 · answer #9 · answered by Joseph 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yeah i think the next super bowl is in new orleans
2007-02-06 07:10:00 · answer #10 · answered by #2 DB 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋