2007-02-05 08:01:07 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football (American)
NO
2007-02-05 08:03:04 · answer #1 · answered by d b 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Overseas is extremely unlikely. If for nothing else, the time difference for American television makes it difficult.
Were they to do it, a new stadium for the 2010 Winter Olympics in Vancouver would be perfect for, let's say, Super Bowl 45ish...which they are not building regardless, and this would still be doubtful even if they were.
With the regular season game in London next season, the NFL has taken a home game away from the average Miami fan. For the Super Bowl, though, the corporate dollars would have no problem going to Canada or Mexico for the game. The average fan will not get to a Super Bowl, even if their team was participating, but they would see a foreign soil Super Bowl as the league turning its back on its own fan base...yet the TV angles would look the same whether playing in Dallas, Los Angeles, Toronto or Mexico City.
2007-02-05 16:24:02 · answer #2 · answered by Gwydyon 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely not! The Super Bowl has become American Tradition, nothing against those places, but the sport is not as popular there as it is here. The NFL is the most watched and brings in more cash than any other American sport. The thought of having a regular season game overseas is fine by me but the Super Bowl is different and something very special to me and many Americans and much more appreciated by us as well, with all do respect to Dublin and London.
2007-02-05 16:14:08 · answer #3 · answered by bnsymv 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No I don't think so . Why should AMERICANS be subject to getting passports and paying a higher price including airfare to watch an American football game? I do not think that would sit well with America. I think the 50th Super Bowl should be held in the Continental United States and be fair for all Americans. Maybe even a lottery for tickets so everyone has a chance to attend the game.
2007-02-05 16:11:19 · answer #4 · answered by mdsmith9372 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO! Why would they do that? It's a purely American sport. In fact Football to Dublin and London is an entirely different sport.
Considering the rain all night during the game I think next year they'll be holding it in a Dome!
2007-02-05 16:07:21 · answer #5 · answered by i have no idea 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No it should be held in Green Bay where the first one was held. It won't happen because it is up north and the poor celebs might get their touses frozen. I would love to see another Super Bowl played outside up north. That is how the game developed and that is how it should be played. I vote for Fifty at Green Bay.
2007-02-05 16:10:25 · answer #6 · answered by 91106 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO! that'd be like hosting the FIFA World Cup in some poedunk town Texas. No one outside the US cares about our Football. NFL Europe is a joke.
2007-02-05 16:06:43 · answer #7 · answered by Nara 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No! It's already bad enough that the NFL is moving one to two regular season games abroad each season now. Teams lose revenue that they are able to make by having a home game (like selling tickets), the timing will be messed up, and season ticket holders for a team are essentially cheated. Leave the NFL in the USA. If Europe wants football, they should make their own league! (We're already giving them NFL Europa)
2007-02-05 16:05:34 · answer #8 · answered by CB #7 ftw 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No, I don't think so. Internationals are not familiar with the styles and rules of American Football. It's called 'American' for a reason right?
2007-02-05 16:08:30 · answer #9 · answered by Nima 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In three words: Nope! Zip! Nadda!
2007-02-05 16:22:28 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
why would they do that?????
football is an American sport so it should be played in america, not a different country
you are dumb for asking that question.
2007-02-05 16:04:24 · answer #11 · answered by camijo17 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋