2007-02-05 07:13:25 · 8 answers · asked by mike s 1 in Sports ➔ Other - Sports
No hitter. More variables.
2007-02-05 07:16:46 · answer #1 · answered by Ralphie 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A no-hitter would be more difficult as the # of factors that impact the outcome are greater than bowling a perfect game. Bowling requires the input of one individual while performing the event. Pitching involves not just the pitcher but the hitter and all the fielders as a support mechanism to the pitcher. Not only does the pitcher have to be at the top of his game but he needs the support of his teammates behind him to ensure that the balls are fielded and plays are made to score the outs. More moving parts makes it more difficult.
2007-02-05 15:23:51 · answer #2 · answered by george_o_jones 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In my opinion, pitching a no hitter would be much more difficult. It seems to me that a perfect game in bowling is not as rare as throwing a no hitter. Interesting question!
Find more discussion, information, articles, tips, drills, etc on baseball, bowling, and more at http://www.active.com and http://active.typepad.com/teamsports
2007-02-05 15:25:49 · answer #3 · answered by Active.com 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would think... A No hitter... because, there are more chances of screwing that one than a perfect game...
Although... to do any of those, you need to be in a ZONE... everything shoulde be precise...
2007-02-05 15:18:11 · answer #4 · answered by Pianojazzman 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
bowling a perfect game
2007-02-05 15:29:24 · answer #5 · answered by Ultimate Fighter 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no hitter is much harder...
baseball: humans vs. humans (plus more variables)
bowling: humans vs. objects(pins)
2007-02-05 21:51:36 · answer #6 · answered by Mike m 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would depend on whether they were a pro bowler or baseball player
2007-02-05 15:16:06 · answer #7 · answered by osu_fanz 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no hitter
2007-02-05 15:15:18 · answer #8 · answered by Stephen R 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋