To cook at home
2007-02-05 07:15:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Chewie 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Cooking at home is definitely cheaper, but eating out you let someone else clean up the mess and prepare the food and serve it to you. It is a trade off.
2007-02-05 15:16:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by plaplant8 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would say it's cheaper to cook at home. I enjoy cooking anyway.
2007-02-05 15:17:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by ********* 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
if you have the time it is far cheaper to cook at home and tastes better only if you can cook if you can't than pick up a cook book at the library .if you can read and follow direction's you can cook.
2007-02-05 15:22:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by Sabamika 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
cook in your house...you might think its cheaper to eat out if u only look at one day...but if u look at a month or even a whole week...u'll see that its cheaper to just cook in your house
hope this helped!
2007-02-05 15:16:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by ♥Pyar Ki Pari♥ 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
just by thinking about it..
really its cheaper eating out..
start counting absolutely everything u cook.
2007-02-05 15:19:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by G?ld?n ang?l 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
definitely to cook at home, much cheaper - that's the reason people do it, otherwise we'd all eat out all the time...
2007-02-05 15:16:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Unfortunately to cook at home(which I hate doing) but you usually have left overs to eat on later.
2007-02-05 15:18:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by Backwoods Barbie 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sometimes it does seems cheaper to eat out.
2007-02-05 15:18:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by Chicago Girl 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
the cost is going to be about the same. since you have to go and buy all the things you need to cook it may be about the same as a restaurant or more. plus cooking youreself takes alot more time, so if i were you i would just eat out.
2007-02-05 15:21:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by ace 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
To cook at home, in more ways than one
2007-02-05 15:19:41
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋