English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-02-05 07:04:43 · 10 answers · asked by Yo 100$ (YUWL) (X-way ECW) 4 in Sports Wrestling

10 answers

i love both

2007-02-05 07:08:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Undertaker is better than Kane. He had more titles, and lasted longer than Kane in the WWE.

2007-02-05 15:07:14 · answer #2 · answered by deshi 3 · 0 1

The Undertaker of course. He has beaten Kane more than once before.

2007-02-05 16:22:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

i believe that undertaker is better definetly... and the old kane i believe was and still is better than the new kane any day...but of course undertaker is better than the old and new kane.

2007-02-05 15:33:41 · answer #4 · answered by kristine_star2008 2 · 0 1

kane seems more bulkier and bigger but the last ride and the tombstone is better and undertaker is more popular so taker

2007-02-05 15:12:20 · answer #5 · answered by HBK's #1 Fan (Member Of PAC) 3 · 0 1

Undertaker is better can lost to him twice at wrestlemania

2007-02-05 15:12:48 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Undertaker, by far more diverse. The real quesiton is....WHO BETTA THAN KANYON?! The answer is...nobody

2007-02-05 16:07:22 · answer #7 · answered by Candle 7 · 0 1

in the ring the better man wins only if told to,for goodness sake it's acting

2007-02-05 15:14:19 · answer #8 · answered by TOM 5 · 1 1

I just wanna see them tear each other apart.
Now that would be a good rematch.

2007-02-05 15:28:03 · answer #9 · answered by ? 3 · 1 0

well idk but i like Kane better

2007-02-05 15:09:35 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers