i love both
2007-02-05 07:08:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Undertaker is better than Kane. He had more titles, and lasted longer than Kane in the WWE.
2007-02-05 15:07:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by deshi 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
The Undertaker of course. He has beaten Kane more than once before.
2007-02-05 16:22:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
i believe that undertaker is better definetly... and the old kane i believe was and still is better than the new kane any day...but of course undertaker is better than the old and new kane.
2007-02-05 15:33:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by kristine_star2008 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
kane seems more bulkier and bigger but the last ride and the tombstone is better and undertaker is more popular so taker
2007-02-05 15:12:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by HBK's #1 Fan (Member Of PAC) 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Undertaker is better can lost to him twice at wrestlemania
2007-02-05 15:12:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Undertaker, by far more diverse. The real quesiton is....WHO BETTA THAN KANYON?! The answer is...nobody
2007-02-05 16:07:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by Candle 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
in the ring the better man wins only if told to,for goodness sake it's acting
2007-02-05 15:14:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by TOM 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
I just wanna see them tear each other apart.
Now that would be a good rematch.
2007-02-05 15:28:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
well idk but i like Kane better
2007-02-05 15:09:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋