English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

1 answers

The writer gets some valuable input on ways to improve his/her paper from the perspective of another person. The reviewer can often spot problem areas that went unnoticed by the writer.

In evaluating the work of a peer, the reviewer gets insight as to what characteristics strengthen a paper, and what characteristics weaken a paper. The reviewer can put these insights to work when revising his/her own paper.

2007-02-05 06:47:44 · answer #1 · answered by X 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers