is TNA better than Raw and SmackDown and And Is there super stars better than TNA?

Answer 1

WWE is way better than TNA

Answer 2

You can't really judge TNA up against RAW and Smackdown right now because iMPACT! only has 45 minutes while both WWE shows have 90. That being said the talent on TNA is far superior to both RAW and Smackdown. When TNA gets their second hour then you can start to make a comparrison.

Right now Smackdown is better than RAW for the simple reason that smackdown rarely has anything about it that is extremely wrong while RAW often has completely assinie segments that drag on for 10 and 15 minutes at a time. Smackdown is usually solid but not spectacular, while RAW really wavers from week to week.

Smackdown > RAW
TNA >>>WWECW

And for that guy that said WSX is better than all LOL!! KID WSX isn't even a wrestling show. It is a 30 minute spot and bump show that is heavily condensed and edited with cheesy special effects. G_d d_amn the MTV generation is dumb. No wonder the wrestling business is dying today with you bunch of MTV raised ADHD head cases with attention spans the size of a chipmunks n_t$.

Answer 3

If you want to see wrestling, watch TNA. If you want to see pointless skits involving Donald Trump, turn to WWE. TNA gives real wrestling fans the option of actually seeing some unpredictable wrestling matches. WWE is the show that is actually for kids because it is a "face" show. The "faces" win all the big matches on RAW and at Pay-Per-Views because children love to see their "hero" win his match after defying all odds.

TNA may not be profitable right now but it is not uncommon for a new business to operate at a loss for the first 3-5 years. This was the case with WWE also in their "baby stages" just read up on the history for yourselves. You can't compare the financial situation of a 5 year old company vs. one that has been around for years and actually started back in 1925. Lets be real.

As far as Christian being a champ, why not? He was a good performer and spent 7 years in the WWE only to watch guys like John Cena and Batista get a major push while he stayed in the mid card. TNA is about matches and not over the top gimmicks. I mean the Boogeyman is an absolute disgraceful gimmick. So my vote is for TNA right now because I like matches, not Rosie vs. Trump and Diva dance offs.

Answer 4

Thats hard to say. Raw and SmackDown are both two hours long, that makes four hours of progarming a week (five if you count ECW). TNA impact is only an hour long. That means that WWE has four to five times the time to fill and four to five times the chance of stinking up the place. It really looks like the biggest reason TNA is able to put out better quality programs is because they are so small. Same goes for the roster, quality over quantity.

Answer 5

I think the answer to both of those questions has to be no.

Some may like TNA better, and that's fine. They do cram in a lot more in that hour then WWE does in two! (which I think may actually hurt them in the long run)

TNA stars, are, by and large, inferior to WWE stars, I would say. Mid-card guys like Christian in WWE can be World Champion of TNA? That's a little messed up.

Who can legitimately challenge Angle? Sting and Samoa Joe... that's about it. And even then, I think Angle will seem better.

But all that's irrelivent for the first part of your question.

Even if you like TNA better, you can't really say it's better in general because it's not making money. That's not the sign of a good business. WWE makes a boat-load of cash. TNA, does not. Therefore, it's a matter of figures, WWE is better.

Answer 6

No tna isn't better.
1.they don't have enough air time.
2.not enough talent.
3.crappy storyline writers.
And these are all the people in wwe that are better then every tna star besides kurt angle and aj styles
1.orton
2.cena
3.edge
4.batista
5.dx
6.undertaker
7.chris benoit

Answer 7

Geez, I feel like I'm in kindergarden again. TNA is amatuer wrestling. They either have people who left WWE because of lack of talent (Jeff Jarrett) or have people who will eventually go to or back to WWE (Jeff Hardy and Monty Brown a.k.a. Marques Cor Von). TNA is not the beter show. Mike Tenay and Don West are dumb. Michael Cole and Joey Styles (whom I dispise) could announce circles around them. TNA is for children.

Answer 8

wrestling society x is better than wwe,tna,and ecw.wrestling society x is real wrestling and is kind of like back yard wrestling.it's on mtv 1not 2 tuesday's at 10:30 and the recap is sunday at 10:30 check it out.

Answer 9

tna is a better "wrestling" show but it starting to look like wcw did



clownlove

Answer 10

tna is better