...get covered up with all the hoopla about the possibility of electing the first woman prez in America? And does it hurt us as a nation to elect leaders on the basis of gender, race, or creed?
2007-02-05 06:02:28 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
She is a neo-liberal shrew set on a left of socialist agenda.
2007-02-05 06:05:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
The voters of New Orleans re-elected the phenomenally incompetent Ray Nagin as mayor, after he did nothing of value before, during, or after Hurricane Katrina (except declare it should be rebuilt as a Chocolate City). His success was obviously based on race.
That answers the question.
2007-02-05 06:18:11 · answer #2 · answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm a woman. I would rather have a taod as Prez than her. She's a shrill flip flopping liar. But, at least if she were re-elected maybe she and her hubby could return all the things they stole from the white house when they left.
2007-02-05 06:06:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Every who knows her well despises her. Geraldine Ferrar got nowhere as a VP candidate. Are you not worried about what the media is doing for Obama because of his race?
2007-02-05 06:16:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Shrew is putting it mildly, Yes it hurst us if that's the only criteria you use for electing someone. If my dog had a face like hers, I would shave it's butt and mkae it walk around backwards!
2007-02-05 06:05:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I wouldn't vote for even if she was nice, Honey! And it has nothing to do with her gender, just her politics!
2007-02-05 06:11:41 · answer #6 · answered by LoneStar 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There are a lot of women I would vote for....
she's just never going to be one of them.
2007-02-05 06:07:50 · answer #7 · answered by FOA 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋