And please identify yourself as Lib, Con, Libertarian, Other.
Me: Not Guilty / Libertarian.
2007-02-05 05:53:53 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Anyone who _thinks_ and can read knows the facts: the accuser was coached and prodded by the DA looking to further his career. He has been outed as a fraud and the evidence been shown to be invented and inflated.
Dealing in the facts should have no ideology.
.
2007-02-05 05:58:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I've been following this from day one. Not only has the DA been shown to be a fraud, but the story of the alledged victim has changed so many times that it shot what credibility she had to powder.
Not guilty/ Conservative-libertarian.
2007-02-05 14:01:51 · answer #2 · answered by Firestorm 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There was always proof they were not guilty, it was hidden by the DA who was looking for a high profile case to springboard his political career. Once the defense got hold of it the case fell apart.
Libertarian
2007-02-05 13:58:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Neither. The testimony of the accuser has changed multiple times. There is neither corroborating testimony nor physical evidence that suggest either one actually occurred.
Conservative
2007-02-05 14:04:49 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Guilty of stupidity (which isn't a crime).
Conservative
2007-02-05 13:57:55 · answer #5 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Neither....Con
2007-02-05 13:57:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not guilty/ mod
2007-02-05 13:58:57 · answer #7 · answered by bopoppa 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
THE ONLY ONE GUILTY IN THIS CASE WAS DA MIKE NIFONG.
SO IT'S NOT GUILTY & I CALL MYSELF A CONSERVATIVE WITH SANITY.
2007-02-05 14:27:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
guilty of some incredibly poor judgement. conservative
2007-02-05 14:00:49 · answer #9 · answered by polly j 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not guilty: Liberal
2007-02-05 13:56:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋