2007-02-05 05:53:26 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Obama. It matters not though as the Dems will not allow Clinton to get the nomination. They know that the American public will not elect her and they need the presidency badly to try to get things back on the right track.
2007-02-05 05:58:06 · answer #1 · answered by Michael 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama for Vice President.
2007-02-05 13:57:19 · answer #2 · answered by GO HILLARY 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Neither one. Barack may have you fooled but he's a coc-head and not needed in the white house even as a visitor. Hillary crying about someone makeing money that didn't include her and the arrogant idea she can TAKE IT? what an arrogant dumb-a-ss. What, she made because she didn't get a kick-back for all Billy Boy did for the oil companys? What is she going to do with the drug profits Barack's dealers make? Rehab for her daughter?The joke is not that these two imbosils are running, the joke is real live people take these towel-head huggers serious. People with the right to vote but not brains enough.
2007-02-05 14:06:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Anyone who chooses a Jackass as a mascot is not worth wasting a vote upon. However putting stereotypes aside, Hillary is on a one way track to raise your taxes to the point that your entire pay check will go to the government to pay for her health care program. The only way to make health care affordable in this country is to do something the Politicians can't see. Put a cap on stupid lawsuits. These stupid acts of greed do nothing but raise the rates for insurance and health care for everyone. I am not saying all of them are stupid but most of them are.
2007-02-05 14:09:21 · answer #4 · answered by Realist 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Barack, despite the fact that he may be young and inexperience. I think he will have a new perspective and fresh ideas compared to the usual washington politics that Hillary thrives on.
2007-02-05 16:55:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm leaning towards Obama.
Ms. Clinton still has not come out solidly against the war in Iraq, and now she has said she would support military action in Iran. She has not endorsed a national one-payer system of health care.
2007-02-05 14:44:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Anyone but Hillary she is the anti-christ. Obama is an inexperienced socialist with little to offer. But there are very few politicians withanything to offer.
2007-02-05 14:02:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Obama clearly since hes the only one to introduce legislation to bring our boys back home. To welcome arms, loved and appreciated by all americans for their service to this great nation. Ya they will be down in the dumps because they left a job undone or unfinished but I think toyota will give them jobs in the new factories they are building, they will make good cash and buy houses and maybe reflect on how the US Media whipped us all into a frenzy about imaginary WMD and the sky is falling. Hopefully their moral loss will turn into anger at the people that are working to keep us in a state of terror and they will start to realize all the liberal/conservative rhetoric is just a distraction from what is really going on.
2007-02-05 14:01:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I LOVE the idea that Barack Obama is approaching this as a positive campaign. People complained that previous campaigns were all negative, so they absolutely need to latch onto Obama!
2007-02-05 14:46:34 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Neither. Obama is hard-left and Hillary is just a corrupt power-hungry pol.
2007-02-05 14:06:19 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋