He was giving a talk in Totnes, Devon last evening. He conveyed his experiece with us, and told how he was the "only" witness to give evidence to the 9/11 comission "behind closed doors"
No press or cameras were allowed. He told us he was in level "B2" (basement) when there was an extremely violent explosion from a lower basement level. (before the aircraft hit the building) He told the comission that there were a further 22 witnesses that could confirm this. The comission refused to allow them to give evidence, and their final report completely ignore his evidence.
My question is WHY?
2007-02-05 05:28:53 · 7 answers · asked by researcher 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Because 9/11 was an inside job!
2007-02-05 05:32:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
I have often believed that there was more to the 9/11 attacks. If what your saying is correct then I am not surprised I am even more convinced. For those towers to fall like that from the planes flying into them is in correct - you should check the conspricacy websites that show how towers like that normal fall if the experiance earthquakes or fires - they do not totally fall to the ground, the shell is left standing - so in order for those to have fallen the way they did, there had to be inside demolition charges.
Have a look at the building behind the two towers that caught on fire by passing debris - they do admit to demolishing that by explosion - it also falls the same way the others do.
Its totally sickening to think that our own people could have been involved in that attack - disgusting! Shame on you!
2007-02-05 13:41:46 · answer #2 · answered by kel_mccoy_uk555 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
It's funny how the seismic detectors at Columbia didn't detect anything until the first plane hit. I guess this is proof positive why eyewitness testimony needs to be taken in context...
But he has made a bit of loose change on the talking circuit... much more than he did at WTC.
2007-02-05 13:39:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Are you saying the American government were responsible for the fall of the towers ? Not sure i can believe that, for what reason ? to find an excuse to invade Iraq ? We all know the US do not need to go to that length to invade another country. But having said that, i would not trust the US when it comes to things like this !!
2007-02-05 13:38:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Willie Rodriguez has been debunked by many people. He has changed his story slightly, and none of it now fits with what thousands of other people have said.
He's just looking for a buck and some fame. Sorry to have to break it to you.
2007-02-05 13:47:29 · answer #5 · answered by theearlybirdy 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Give a link please (though if it's from infowars, priosonplanet or the like, don't bother).
2007-02-05 13:40:22 · answer #6 · answered by Firestorm 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Link???????..........................Link????????.........................???????............................I'm waiting.
2007-02-05 13:32:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋