English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

In as much as there is no statute of limitations on murder, shouldn't a special prosecutor be enlisted to investigate the actions of Senator Kennedy?
http://www.ytedk.com/

2007-02-05 05:09:34 · 21 answers · asked by merlins_new_apprentice 3 in Politics & Government Politics

For those of you who responded that the Senator had already been tried and would therefore be facing "double-jeopard", you are INCORRECT. Kennedy only plead guilty to leaving the scene of an accident. He was never tried for murder and, therefore, double jeopardy does not apply.

2007-02-05 05:41:10 · update #1

21 answers

Yes.

2007-02-05 05:17:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

Your source of suggestion is unreliable to assert the least. the main i will discover in this tale exterior of loopy conspiracy theorist sites is that she became into in touch in a deadly twist of destiny with a former classmate whilst she became into 17. there became into no information of murderous reason, alcohol or drug abuse. relatively the worst that she might have been charged with could have been vehicular manslaughter, yet there have been no quotes filed. Why? simply by fact Dick Chenney hopped into his magical time device to hide her tracks? No, it became into simply by fact she became right into a 17 365 days previous lady who by risk bumped into somebody, no longer a crazed ex-lady chum searching for blood. heavily, it relatively is pathetic that persons will drag up issues like this just to purpose to make politicians look undesirable.

2016-10-01 11:26:10 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

This issue is as dead as Mary Jo. It's been decades, why the retro-rage over Ted Kennedy when we've got bigger fish to fry? How is he to be tried twice for the same crime? He was already acquitted.

2007-02-05 05:24:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Shouldn't Laura Bush be charged as well ?...that was hushed up pretty well by her influential parents...if you're gonna throw accusations around at least be fair and not just pick out Democrats...using wealth to manipulate the system is not a Democratic trait, it is pretty universal

2007-02-05 05:22:12 · answer #4 · answered by Ford Prefect 7 · 3 1

I would love to see it, that old air bag got away with murder,she was pregnant and he needed to dispose of her with the help of "the family"...I would love it, talk about justice...

I can only imagine how her family must feel...the word is you don't mess with the Kennedys...look at what happened to Marilyn Monroe...

2007-02-05 05:32:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Well should Bush be tried for treason using your logic, and his Treasnous acts are more recent than a 40 year old accident, you guys just love to live in NA NA land don't ya?

2007-02-05 05:16:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

Hey Perry Mason,
Just what evidence do you have to convict him with? You're just going to start convicting people based on just an accusation alone? Just because you don't like his politics?

2007-02-05 05:48:04 · answer #7 · answered by mel m 2 · 1 1

Are you so out of touch with current events that you must regress to an event that occurred decades ago? Give me a break, will you?

2007-02-05 05:22:56 · answer #8 · answered by Hemingway 4 · 2 1

Why not? We can put Laura Bush on trial as well. There are witnesses to that incident.

2007-02-05 05:25:40 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

but that was a long time ago ,,and it would be such a long drawn out trial, and the family would have to relive memories that have faded away

,,you aint believing this crap are you
hang that sucker high

2007-02-05 05:16:20 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers