English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-02-05 05:09:17 · 22 answers · asked by _DestroyingAngel_ 3 in Politics & Government Politics

22 answers

iF YOU LIKE A KNIFE IN YOUR BACK

2007-02-05 05:15:00 · answer #1 · answered by cowboybronco01 4 · 7 1

Hilary Clinton doesn’t have the experience, in the military or intelligence sectors of our government to be effective in a time when we are fighting a war oversees and conducting a broader “war” on terrorism. Normally, this would not be an impediment...there have been many good Presidents, with no serious military credentials –– her husband being one of them. However, in order to rectify the quagmire that Bush has got us in, and also to redirect the “War on Terrorism” more effectively, and away from this Cowboy/Rambo strategy employed by Bush and his Henchmen, requires someone of either military or strategic competence. Hillary might be good at making chocolate chip cookies... but right now we need someone who demonstrates mastery of both military tactics and foreign diplomacy.

2007-02-05 13:29:22 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Nope, Rosie the maid from the Jetsons would be a better Female Robot for the job. She is a good side show though. Maybe she could be the White House Jester.

2007-02-05 13:17:30 · answer #3 · answered by mbush40 6 · 4 1

I support Hillary Clinton for President. She's a tough, brilliant lady and I agree with the lion's share of her stand on the issues. I'll be working on her campaign. It will be the first time I have done that since the Reagan years.

2007-02-05 13:21:26 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 5

No. But, if she runs, it will make things easier for her opponent. I don't think most voters want the presidency to remain in the hands of the same two families yet another term.

2007-02-05 13:15:39 · answer #5 · answered by martinmagini 6 · 5 2

Yes of course it's a good idea. Then we could call her names' print up impeach Hillary signs, dig up dirt,besmirch her cabinet members,Dan Rather could look up her service record and we could make her look like a bumbling idiot (oh, excuse me, she's already done that), and in general make our President seem incompetent and inept.

2007-02-05 13:22:37 · answer #6 · answered by H.C.Will 3 · 0 3

Hillary Clinton is unmatched in domestic and world affairs, she would be a great President.

2007-02-05 13:25:06 · answer #7 · answered by GO HILLARY 7 · 1 5

Many do and that's why she is running. Although she is NOT the top of my list, she would be an immensely vast improvement over the present UNelected dictator.

2007-02-05 13:30:58 · answer #8 · answered by rhino9joe 5 · 2 2

Lot's of people think it's a great idea, but the thought of her in the white house frightens me.

2007-02-05 13:13:42 · answer #9 · answered by taylorvoltaire 2 · 7 1

no i dont. and i am going to point and laugh at the person who thinks she will. and before yoyu get your panties in a wad ladies, im a republican so i wouldnt vote for her even if she was male. which by the way i dont totally rule out as a possibility.

2007-02-05 13:13:48 · answer #10 · answered by look behind you 2 · 7 1

She shouldn't be President of anything. Well, maybe the Communist Party...She's already a member.

2007-02-05 13:13:25 · answer #11 · answered by FRANKFUSS 6 · 6 1

fedest.com, questions and answers