Prince at the Superbowl Halftime sorta of sucked I think only older ppl liked it?
Who do u think they should of have?
2007-02-05 05:08:53 · 11 answers · asked by Cheez B 2 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
it sucked and prince sucks. i swear he has to be atleast bisexual.
2007-02-05 05:15:37 · answer #1 · answered by raymond m 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I thought the end, when he sang Purple Rain was GREAT, it could have been better from start to finish if he would have done more singing than walking around and guitar solos, and those dumb dancers he had up there with him. I was excited when he started off with 'Let's Go Crazy' but then it fell a little flat. The middle medley of Baby I'm A Star, All Along the Watchtower ,and then the Foo Fighter song was different. Overall I just don't think the performance packed a punch, which is hard to do in a less than 10 minute segment.
2007-02-05 05:30:06 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
first off, the rain suck cus it's not good watchin a rainy performance no matter what stage it is on. Not good on TV when all you see is foggy lenses through a $2000 plasma hd big screen tv. And its funny how Prince (or the artist formely known as that) has any linked to football. Yea cus when i think of football, Prince came to mind. He and micheal Jackson are the gayest looking straight guy i have ever seen. I wouldnt be suprised if Prince came out and say he's gay but i would be suprised if he came out and make out with a chick. Maybe im just a normal straight guy who's in his late 20's but I dont think Prince (the artist formely known as gay) should do anything with hard hitting football. But that's just me.
2007-02-05 05:17:39 · answer #3 · answered by epicwolf 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Could have been better. Prince's butchering of that Foo Fighters' song reminded me that the Foo Fighters would have been a much better idea for a halftime performer.
We watched, but mostly wisecracked at Prince's expense throughout the performance.
2007-02-05 05:28:46 · answer #4 · answered by stickboy_127 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like Prince, however I thought he was a terrible choice for a halftime show. I think they should of had Billy Joel stick around and play at halftime.
2007-02-05 05:12:51 · answer #5 · answered by 7 Words You Can't Say On T.V 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm one of those older people (49) and it sucked. The NFL could have had almost anyone they wanted and they got Prince? Bad choice. The last two years were good with Aerosmith and Paul McCartney. Hopefully next year will be a better choice.
2007-02-05 05:42:37 · answer #6 · answered by ndmagicman 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ever since the boob incident we have been subjected to poor performances at halftime. Dont expect it to change anytime soon.
2007-02-05 05:16:46 · answer #7 · answered by Kenneth W 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i didnt like the show prince did at half time. he just seemed out of place. there are a hundred people they could have had that would have been better.
2007-02-05 05:15:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Prince did the damn thing. That was a perfect show. No controversy, no nothing and to me the show was off the hook. Sorry you felt that the show sucked.
2007-02-05 06:17:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
this older person fixed his plate of food with dessert
kept the TV on -
didn't miss a thing - my key lime pie was 1,000 times better
And the Colts winning - priceless!
2007-02-05 05:18:42 · answer #10 · answered by tom4bucs 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋