I hope Los Angeles will be one of them because i dont like to see Superbowl's having bad weather for the game. And i dont want to hear east coast or mid west people saying "that's what real football is all about." Cus that's a bunch of bullcrab! Los Angeles should host the superbowl every year cus we have 80 degrees during Febuary every year. This year superbowl suck cus it's raining and teams end up not playing like themselves.
2007-02-05 05:01:44 · 5 answers · asked by epicwolf 4 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
XLII Glendale, Ariz.
XLIII Tampa, Fla.
XLIV Miami, Fla.
2007-02-05 05:38:02 · answer #1 · answered by Chris 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
is the city great sufficient to hold that many ppl?? are there lost of lodges in the city?? friendly ppl?? what's there to do??? and probable what place is friggin mind-blowing?? ohh and funds.. each little thing boils all the way down to funds!! and for some reason i think of seattle lask that specific something that makes the NFL merely and say "wow we could constantly have the superbowl in seatte" and probable not mant ppl could factor at seattle on the map!
2016-12-13 09:24:14 · answer #2 · answered by unck 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Los Angeles doesnt have a team, so they cant host it.
2007-02-05 05:31:11 · answer #3 · answered by Kutekymmee 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nope - the next few are listed here, and LA is not oon the list. (Sorry). http://www.superbowl.com/features/futuresites
2007-02-05 05:41:58 · answer #4 · answered by SteelerFan_2006_ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You sir, are an idiot
2007-02-05 05:55:34 · answer #5 · answered by NML 1635 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋