i think that the bears should have won and they would have won if it were not for the refs and turnovers
2007-02-05 03:44:27 · 16 answers · asked by camijo17 3 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
wow, another moron... if the bears DESERVED to win than, simply, they would have done what it takes to WIN
2007-02-05 03:47:00 · answer #1 · answered by NASER™ 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Turnovers were a issue for the Bears. Didn't see much the refs did that caused the bears much trouble. The biggest problem for the Bears was a complete and utter lack of offense. Other than the one 52 yard run by Jones the Bears did not have much offense. Plus the Bears D gave up 430 total yards.
2007-02-05 11:59:44 · answer #2 · answered by SoccerClipCincy 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The better playing team should win the superbowl and they did. I'm a long time bears fan and we just couldnt play to match the colts last nite. It had nothing to do with the refs! Yeah, turnovers of course but that went both ways--colts won fair and square. Well deserved colts!
2007-02-05 11:50:02 · answer #3 · answered by naomi b 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
THE REFS ARE YOU KIDDING??
ok now lets see, this coming from someone who didnt really care who won..
lets look back at the play offs when the refs weren't so anti Bears
the Bears weren't able to stop the Colts
the Colts executed plays the Bears couldn't get their offense
going , and their defense ran out of gas
2007-02-05 11:50:20 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
no, the turnovers and fumbles were of their own accord (the colt's had some themselves) the calls that the refs made....If I remember correctly they called mostly against the colts, the bears had very few flags thrown their way. they played sloppy and the colts were able to overcome their own mishaps and win.
2007-02-05 11:50:29 · answer #5 · answered by NolaDawn 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The Colts dominated in just about every statistic of the game, including points.
However, you are correct in that the Colts dominated in turnovers. They beat the Bears at their own game.
So sweet.
2007-02-05 11:48:22 · answer #6 · answered by like a BOSS 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
No, actually I don't think they should have gotten as far as they did. The Seahawks blew the game against the Bears. The NFC is the Junior Varsity of the NFL.
2007-02-05 11:52:19 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
LOL. They played like crap. Indy played better. Chicago should not have won. I am a Bears fan and they just couldnt get the job done.
2007-02-05 11:48:20 · answer #8 · answered by behr28 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
The game includes turnovers, bad calls, slippery balls, etc.
In the end it's who makes the most points and yesterday it was the COLTS.
2007-02-05 11:47:53 · answer #9 · answered by daljack -a girl 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
its because the bears wouldn't kick the ball in the net to get points. they would only give it to the colts. i think it was probably a fixed game. the colts are good in defense and offence but it still is fixed i think. bears could have done better though and maybe win the superbowl but they didn't get the net goal.
2007-02-05 11:50:10 · answer #10 · answered by Han N 1 · 0⤊ 5⤋
a collapsed defence, inexusable turnovers.......they are lucky to not have been completely blown out!
2007-02-05 11:54:25 · answer #11 · answered by tom2day 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋