English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Would you vote for Ralph Nader again in 2008, and is he a better alternative to the Democrats currently running?

2007-02-05 03:29:06 · 11 answers · asked by radical4capitalism 3 in Politics & Government Politics

11 answers

I voted for him before and I'd vote for him again. I haven't voted for a Democrat or Republican in a national election since I started voting, thirty years ago.

2007-02-05 03:32:58 · answer #1 · answered by jim 6 · 1 0

certain, i love Ralph Nader Ralph Nader (born February 27, 1934) is an American lawyer and political activist contained in the factors of client rights, humanitarianism, environmentalism and democratic authorities. He helped found many governmental and non-governmental businesses, jointly with the Environmental threat-free practices business business enterprise (EPA), Occupational safe practices and wellness administration (OSHA), Public Citizen, and countless different Public pastime study communities (PIRGs), jointly with NYPIRG. Nader has been a staunch critic of agencies, which he believes wield too a lot means and are undermining the necessary American values of democracy and human rights. RALPH NADER IN WIKIPEDIA certain HAVE a call.. VOTE NADER tremendous guy I

2016-11-02 09:31:26 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If Nader had a chance of winning, it wouldn't be 'wasted votes'. But sadly, by voting for Nader, you are throwing away your vote...all the while thinking that you have made a stand...by not voting for one of the parties that WILL get into power. This is dangerous, and can seriously hinder the voting process.

The right to vote is, perhaps, the most important civic responsibility one has. It was hard fought for, and is the basis of American civilization. So why throw it away?

2007-02-05 03:51:46 · answer #3 · answered by Super Ruper 6 · 0 1

I've never voted for Ralph Nader. Voting for Nader is the same as not voting at all.

2007-02-05 03:31:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

If Ralph Nader ran as a Socialist, he would at least be up front with his politics.

2007-02-05 03:39:43 · answer #5 · answered by Bad Samaritan 4 · 0 1

radical Ralph took money for 40 years; Why is it He never united the third party ballots under one banner.
Your not thinking clearly.
Laundered money is putting our candidates in office not votes.
`123 million ballots in the electoral college when 186 million people voted.
The United Third Party is here to do that.
Take the 3rd Party Ballot to the vote that counts.
Ralph never did that in 40 years.
says a lot of country and patriotism.

2007-02-05 03:34:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I never voted for him in the first place. He is responsible for the seat belt laws.....he loves taking away people's rights.

2007-02-05 03:50:49 · answer #7 · answered by TexasRose 6 · 0 1

No-I didn't vote for him before. And we only have two qualified Dems running, and the first name doesn't begin with an "H".

2007-02-05 03:32:28 · answer #8 · answered by Big Bear 7 · 0 1

No, because that would have meant voting for him the first time around.

2007-02-05 03:32:01 · answer #9 · answered by John J 1 · 0 1

I agree with some of his ideas....but I didn't vote for him before.

Voting for him takes votes away from my party....not good strategy.

2007-02-05 03:33:32 · answer #10 · answered by daljack -a girl 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers