English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i think it is the result of the devil.

2007-02-05 03:17:20 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Cultures & Groups Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender

28 answers

There are numerous reliable sources you can read that explores your very question. May I suggest you read some, BEFORE trying to formulate theories?

2007-02-05 03:32:37 · answer #1 · answered by Kedar 7 · 3 1

I would like to know on what basis you make this statement. Nothing is 100%. There will always be scientists whose only goal in life is to disprove what another scientist has said. But there is an exceedingly strong chance that it's genetic. That has a strong scientific backing behind it.
I'm so sick of hearing that this is the devil or that is the devil. You can't help what you are attracted to. You can blame whatever you want, but the bottom line is that God gave us a free will. I am a Christian and I'm gay. Deal with it.

2007-02-05 03:26:32 · answer #2 · answered by ron s 5 · 1 0

It is also not scientifically proven that man came from an ape or that life began by accident or that creation never occurred but there is a lot of scientific evidence to show that it may have come from a gene similar to those that are predisposed to being alcoholics etc. The arguments on this have gone on for years and there is a boatload of info to support either theory. In some cases it may be learned behavior, typically in homes where a male role model is missing or a strong willed mother rules the roost but that is also not present in a multitude of cases so take your pick. Does it make a difference?

2007-02-05 03:26:55 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

You thin the Devil changed the genes of the homosexual? Wow that is a lot of power. So the question is - why did God allow this to happen?

2007-02-05 03:27:17 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

i've got already study some articles which assert scientists are narrowing homosexuality right down to a particular mutation in a human's genes. as nicely "nurture", "nature" is turning out to be a real clarification for homosexuality. i detect it fully disgusting that persons might evaluate homosexuals to thieves and murderers. people degrade themselves via even suggesting this variety of ingredient. it relatively is laughable, that one remark which states homosexuality is "unnatural" and that animals do no longer romp with their very own gender. Homosexuality is extraordinarily sought after in many animals (ducks, sheep, and ostriches tend in direction of it the main). There are even species of fish and lizards which don't have adult males. I in basic terms be attentive to the info on the lizards. curiously for the duration of mating season, a girl or 2 of the team will surge with testosterone and initiate going at it together with her companions. Miraculously, fertilized eggs come out of this extraordinary mating without sperm in touch. extraordinarily neat, eh?

2016-10-01 11:17:50 · answer #5 · answered by persaud 4 · 0 0

Anything not proven to be genetic must be the work of the devil, huh? Interesting theory. How about, anything, genetic or not, is the result of God? You apparently are a Satanist. What else does your philosophy say?

2007-02-05 03:51:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

They haven't proven that HETEROSEXUALITY is 100% genetic either! I guess it must be "the result of the devil" as well!

They haven't proven that handed-ness is genetic either.

Is that "the result of the devil" too now?

2007-02-05 03:52:19 · answer #7 · answered by DEATH 7 · 4 0

If homosexuality is the result of the devil,

Hail the devil! (For making me feel love)

2007-02-05 03:27:15 · answer #8 · answered by Ieshwar 2 · 4 0

Its not from the devil, and NO Sawyer, it is not learned behavior. It is simply a very minor personality variation that requires no further scrutiny.

Truth be told, the ones who are so freaking hung up on anti-gay antics are the ones whe need mental help.

2007-02-05 03:28:12 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

No. I believe ALL sexual orientations are probably a result of an interaction between biological forces and social forces, not just one type of force alone. There is no definitive proof that any sexual orientation is solely dependent on genes alone (or even fetal hormones alone).

2007-02-05 06:23:17 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Anything hot or pleasurable is the devil to you people. Who someone else loves isn't your business so what does the Devil have to do with it?

2007-02-05 03:47:23 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers