English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I had a hard time choosing these two monitors but I took the more expensive and older model because it came with a 3 year perfect screen warranty. That means that I can change the monitor anytime the screen has a dead pixels. For the cheaper and newer model, I had to wait for 2 dead pixels within the first year and 3 pixels the following two years before I could change it. Do you think that my choice to pay more and buy the older model was worth it for the "perfect screen" warranty?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Retailing at US$295
Response Time: 8ms
Contrast Ratio: 700:1
Brightness: 300cd/m2
Dual Input VGA/DVI
Built in Speakers
USB 2.0 port
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Retailing at US$260
Response Time: 5ms
Contrast Ratio: 800:1
16.7M Colors (8bit)
Brightness: 300cd/m2
Dual Input VGA/DVI
Built in Speakers
Dual tone Design

2007-02-05 02:49:45 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Computers & Internet Hardware Monitors

3 answers

If it were me I would have chosen the cheaper one. ...because of the contrast ratio. The higher the contrast ratio is the better the color definition which is important to anyone who does alot of graphics or enjoys manipulating/retouching photos. If you are a gamer you'll want the higher contrast ratio AND higher response time.
In the end though it depends on what is most important to you...better warranty, but less performance or better performance, lesser warranty.
Built in speakers are pointless. I recently purchased an LCD monitor with built in speakers. The built in speakers on mine were well...terrible. ...but they are better than nothing. I ended up buying a set of great sounding Logitech X-230 speakers. I got them from http://www.directron.com for $36.99 + tax. Best Buy prices them at $60.

2007-02-05 03:36:21 · answer #1 · answered by ModelFlyerChick 6 · 0 0

In my experience you are much more likely to experience a backlight failure than dead pixels within 3 years. Many of the manufacturers warrantys only cover the backlight for 1 year, so hopefully your 3 year warranty also covers the backlight.

2007-02-05 03:13:20 · answer #2 · answered by whodeyflya 6 · 0 0

The technologies in the back of liquid crystal exhibit's potential they do no longer flicker. which potential much less stress on your eyes. you could desire to get one with a quickly reaction time (2-5ms). do no longer bypass to CRT's. the only reason absolutely everyone might purchase a CRT now may well be simply by fact it would have extra appropriate shade illustration (considering the fact that its analogue) and can help larger resolutions on a smaller exhibit length. yet quite, CRT's are actually high priced and difficult to detect new. bypass liquid crystal exhibit. Its the way of the destiny! All super agencies and organistions jointly with universities might have phased out CRT's by employing now or in the subsequent a million-2 years, so thats a stable indicator of the suitable course!)

2016-12-17 09:51:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers