I had a hard time choosing these two monitors but I took the more expensive and older model because it came with a 3 year perfect screen warranty. That means that I can change the monitor anytime the screen has a dead pixels. For the cheaper and newer model, I had to wait for 2 dead pixels within the first year and 3 pixels the following two years before I could change it. Do you think that my choice to pay more and buy the older model was worth it for the "perfect screen" warranty?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Retailing at US$295
Response Time: 8ms
Contrast Ratio: 700:1
Brightness: 300cd/m2
Dual Input VGA/DVI
Built in Speakers
USB 2.0 port
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Retailing at US$260
Response Time: 5ms
Contrast Ratio: 800:1
16.7M Colors (8bit)
Brightness: 300cd/m2
Dual Input VGA/DVI
Built in Speakers
Dual tone Design
2007-02-05
02:49:45
·
3 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Computers & Internet
➔ Hardware
➔ Monitors