To the comment of dyeing in the name of Allah, or in the name of God mmm......... let think now................
But in the name of Blair.......come on give us break........................
2007-02-05 01:56:22 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
ok, maybe u should run for prime mininster if ya so passionate about it
2007-02-05 01:59:32 · answer #1 · answered by *sarah* 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
a number of you in this web site have the theory that turning out to be a member of the military takes away a infantrymen rights to live on. In a conflict for sure a soldier ought to do his duty and strive against to guard his usa. yet Iraq isn't a common conflict, that is a cou set up no longer to guard this usa and the human beings in it yet to take administration of a few thing that does no longer belong to us (oil) and create a regime change to benefit us of a marginally than the English. It develop into bitterly hostile through the human beings of this usa and the UN, it develop into and is an unlawful conflict, even as a soldier supplies his existence he expects the conflict to were idea out and balanced hostile to the percentages, he expects the right equipment and equipment to do the activity. Our infantrymen have died although no longer having the right equipment or necessary technique. This conflict has created such issues as concentration camps, torture, killing of little ones, men lady and little ones, virtually a million Iraqis useless and a further million with intense loss injuries. even as Saddam develop into in skill those human beings were alive and existence went on all factions were held less than administration. no human being except for Saddam can administration the human beings. So there is now civil conflict with tens of thousand extra deaths to go back and extra British and American infantrymen yet to die. i'm sorry No soldier receives intense adequate salary to strive against for incompetence. he's not scuffling with for the overall public of the British human beings because we made it sparkling on the starting up that this conflict develop into no longer to happen. Blair is a conflict criminal and accountable for each human being of those infantrymen deaths, he shold be tried as such.
2016-11-25 03:39:05 · answer #2 · answered by sposato 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It might look better if Mr Blair or anyone of his ministers were to visit the relatives of those killed, and the people who have been wounded. The only visits have been to the troops in Iraq to get them to keep fighting!
2007-02-05 03:11:22 · answer #3 · answered by Duffer 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We have "troops" mate, not bloody "troups", and the only "dyeing" that I know, is when you change the colour of hair/fabric etc. Instead of wasting your time on here, maybe a term or two in school would be beneficial.
2007-02-05 02:56:48 · answer #4 · answered by PATRICK C 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Just vote New Labour out at the next election.
2007-02-05 02:04:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Ok you have made your point now. Everyone has their own opinions about the war in Iraq, so let it lie. Carrying on posting on here isn't gonna change anything mate!
2007-02-05 02:02:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Nu Labour & Blair are both finished!!!!
2007-02-05 02:47:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Troops mate - and have a look at this ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a1vwKZiDsY4
It might cheer you up
2007-02-05 02:09:50 · answer #8 · answered by LongJohns 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can't see you way up there on your high horse!
2007-02-05 01:59:41 · answer #9 · answered by Captain Eyewash 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋