English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i guess i'm asking what are the arguments for both sides? i'm not taking a side here so don't go crazy... please and thank you

2007-02-05 01:42:40 · 2 answers · asked by fcukriot 3 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

2 answers

The primary argument against is that it is cruel & inhumane to subject any animal to pain, discomfort, or death, regardless of the intended outcome or benefits.

The other side would reply that thru this research many treatments & drugs have been refined to better the lives of many sick people, & that the animals were bred specifically for that purpose.

It could be testing cosmetics affect when they get in the eyes, or a wide variety of tests & "experiments"

2007-02-07 14:04:07 · answer #1 · answered by SantaBud 6 · 0 0

the numerous situation which rises from the anti experimental foyer is the right to apply an animal to attempt drugs etc on, is this ethically nicely proper. i am going to respond to the pro,s and con,s. there's a pick to attempt new healing drugs earlier to human use, it truly is critical. there is not any pick although to attempt cosmetics on animals.there's a huge number of analyze that is being executed utilising animals which will be executed now utilising different ideas together with tissue culturing. As a scientist I do see that there's a pick for necessary analyze to be executed utilising animal fashions yet in common words till different ideas were delivered ahead to make this mind-set redundant

2016-11-25 03:38:29 · answer #2 · answered by sposato 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers