2007-02-05 01:12:55 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Hillary has more in common with the National Socialist of the 1920's - 1940's than anything the founding fathers invisioned.
Look at these points from the Nazi Party Platform:
- That all unearned income, and all income that does not arise from work, be abolished.
And compare this to the liberals attacks on Capital Gains.
- Since every war imposes on the people fearful sacrifices in blood and treasure, all personal profit arising from the war must be regarded as treason to the people. We therefore demand the total confiscation of all war profits
And the liberals view on corporations like Haliburton
- We demand profit-sharing in large industries
And Hitleries attack on Exxon
- We demand a generous increase in old-age pensions
Liberal support of Social Security
- We demand the creation and maintenance of a sound middle-class, the immediate communalization of large stores which will be rented cheaply to small tradespeople, and the strongest consideration must be given to ensure that small traders shall deliver the supplies needed by the State, the provinces and municipalities.
Attacks on Wal-Mart
- We demand an agrarian reform in accordance with our national requirements, and the enactment of a law to expropriate the owners without compensation of any land needed for the common purpose. The abolition of ground rents, and the prohibition of all speculation in land.
Kelo is right out of this playbook.
- In order to make it possible for every capable and industrious German to obtain higher education, and thus the opportunity to reach into positions of leadership, the State must assume the responsibility of organizing thoroughly the entire cultural system of the people. The curricula of all educational establishments shall be adapted to practical life. The conception of the State Idea (science of citizenship) must be taught in the schools from the very beginning. We demand that specially talented children of poor parents, whatever their station or occupation, be educated at the expense of the State.
No explanation needed. Exactly the same in the Democrat Party Platform.
- The State has the duty to help raise the standard of national health
Hillart Care Redux
- We demand that there be a legal campaign against those who propagate deliberate political lies and disseminate them through the press.
Fairness Doctrine
The demo'rats are nothing more than the old national socialist of germany and italy of 80 years ago. Nothing "progressive" about these ideas.
2007-02-05 01:38:45 · answer #1 · answered by radical4capitalism 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hillary or not, should we assume you're in favor of the huge taxpayer-funded subsidies that support and enrich those same corporations? I'd be happy to tax those corporations at the same rate as individuals if we could remove all the other special treatment they get that we as citizens don't get.
Stop playing political-party games and look at where your money goes.
2007-02-05 01:43:29 · answer #2 · answered by mattzcoz 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
How about if we take her record book deal profits and start an educational fund?
She got a book deal with an eight MILLION dollar advance. No one gets anywhere near that - not Stephen King, not Danielle Steele, not Michael Crichton. Since she had record profits never before heard of, why doesn't she use some of that money to promote her ideas instead of stealing from the stockholders of US corporations?
.
2007-02-05 01:16:19 · answer #3 · answered by FozzieBear 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
no longer who i desire in the whitehouse. Welcome to politics nonetheless. fact is relatively everyone that runs for president is like that and there is not any longer something the well-known american man or woman can do approximately it. Ever observed how there is by no potential been a unfavourable president? the full ingredient is staged so as that the wealthy individuals are the only ones with any potential. And for the bonus, Liberals or Republican, the two misinform people so they might get reelected or get elected. Welcome to u.s., land of the liars, cheats, and the unfastened. As for the responce above mine that seems form of racist to be suspicious of Bama for working. How is it suspicious? Please make sparkling this for me so it would not look a racist slap.
2016-10-01 11:11:02 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She's a closet Socialist.
Hugo Chavez was a closet Socialist, too...
2007-02-05 01:18:25 · answer #5 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Nice name, Tee. Really adds credibility.
So, you also believe that Global Warming is just a cycle and we are not causing it. Is that true?
Please provide a link so that I can address your Clinton question - specifically about "taking profits". Thanks.
2007-02-05 01:30:23 · answer #6 · answered by justagirl33552 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Of course she is a socialist. Isn't that will all liberal democrates are?
2007-02-05 01:27:22 · answer #7 · answered by espreses@sbcglobal.net 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Her friends Kennedy and Kerry are rich. And, if they want to help people, they should give away their wealth to the poor.
2007-02-05 01:18:33 · answer #8 · answered by Duminos 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
conservatives who live in glass houses should not throw stones!
2007-02-05 03:16:47 · answer #9 · answered by MaryAnn K 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Taxation and socialism aren't identical, you know...
2007-02-05 01:21:12 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋