Had India been communist, do you think it would have done better than China?

Question

We always say that China's success is because it is a communist regime and India being a democracy it is not possible to implement projects as fast as china.

Answer 1

Not at all. it would have been more like the USSR. In order to have instituted communism India would have had to eliminate much of the population in the middle in lower castes. Just like Stalin eliminated the very poor and much of the upper middle classes in Russia.

China had their cultural revolution that helped cull out the haves and the have nots. India is a country of theists, in order to have a society without religion there would also have to be a drastic cultural revolution there as well.

China's success has been hampered by them being a communist regime, they began to succeed only when they began to accept capitalism.

Answer 2

there is 3 major factors to look at: a million) The chinese communist equipment is extra centralized than a democratic India. They made a wakeful determination to objective to reveal themselves right into a economic powerhouse, and in a centralized equipment, would were waiting to regulate a gameplan more effective. they have also adapted to extra capitialistic means, something the Soviet Union wasn't prepared to do. 2) India has a lot extra range in its inhabitants, which has brought about sectarian violence and insurgencies through the years, while China is a extra homogenous inhabitants, the position such conflicts do not interfer with productiveness. 3) organic components - China has extra components, greatest them to have a head commence contained in the fashionable economic era. They were adequate of an economic better 1/2 600 years in the past that Columbus suddenly met us of a attempting to hit upon a much better direction to commerce with them. and far of what India did in words of international commerce change into by British rule, which has a tendency now to not go away as many components for the country than in the adventure that they were autonomous.

Answer 3

China is successful because of American investors and there willingness to keep wages low enough for our goods to be produced at the cost they are, which keeps prices in America low enough that the population as a whole can afford them. If the same goods were being produced here they would cost three and four times as much to the consumer. But we (Americans) still find a reason to complain. In short, China isn't successful because of there communist (which they aren't), they are becoming successful because of America's free market society.

Answer 4

Yes, I think and I am sure that if India had been communist, she would have done better than China.

Answer 5

we really do not know feelings of the people in china. there may some cry for freedom. ours is the best democratic country where communism can also flourish. the govt is more important than any political party

Answer 6

The Indian communists are only on paper all their work is distributed to congress party and they are minting wealth

Answer 7

No.India needs a benevolent dictator.

Answer 8

No.The diverse nature of India is the reason.

Answer 9

where it comunists. china is not a comunist ruled. their comunism only in name and it is a one party ruling. undemocratic country

Answer 10

NO, WHAT WE NEED IS AN HONEST HARD WORKING LEADER LIKE NETAJI BOSE OR SARADAR PATEL. WE DON'T NEED TO BE COMMUNIST, WE SHOULD BE MORE NATIONALIST. BHANU RAVAL.