Yesterday's Super Bowl was the only Super Bowl that was rainy.
2007-02-05 00:59:35 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football (American)
yep.yesterday's superbowl sucked
2007-02-05 01:03:35 · answer #1 · answered by looloo 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
A domed or a stadium with a retractable roof. In a championship game I just want to see the two best teams play. This years Superbowl came down to luck, who recovered the turnovers.
2007-02-05 09:15:28 · answer #2 · answered by crazyhorse19682003 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, it should be played like any other NFL game. If anything, they should start holding them in open stadiums the Northeast. Who wouldnt love to see a SuperBowl in Green Bay, Buffalo, Cleveland, or Pittsburgh when its -10 degrees? The NFL is an elitist sport who only caters to the rich. Its only sport where the championship is held at a neutral stadium 1500 miles away from their fans who supported them all year. Personally, I'm glad they all got drenched.
2007-02-05 09:07:49 · answer #3 · answered by wuzzamaddayou 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Nah. Dumb idea. Domed stadiums are only any use to the fans, but football (like baseball) is ALWAYS best played out doors.
So it rained alot in Miami..big deal! It was the same for both teams. Football was never meant to played only in warm & dry conditions. A little rain hurts no-one and is an extra test of the players' handling skills. And have you never seen players make handling errors in totally dry conditions???
2007-02-05 09:14:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, we don't play regular season games in all domed stadiums, why change the game? So it rained, they have played in rain and snow during the season. Why play with the format that has been in existence for many years. Remember when championship games were played in Green Bay and Chicago..
2007-02-05 09:04:58 · answer #5 · answered by DaKnights 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely!
The SuperBowl yesterday was almost a complete disaster! The rain was really messing both teams up badly! (Even though my team won!!!)
And since no one can accuarately predict the weather, it's best to play the most important game of the season in a domed stadium. I think it's only fair also. No reason for excuses if you lose!
2007-02-05 09:08:07 · answer #6 · answered by ♥LadyC♥ 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
No way. As far as I am concerned none of the stadiums should be domed. Football is made to be played outside. I think they just started building domes to get more fans to go to games.
2007-02-05 09:10:15 · answer #7 · answered by cola 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No I think the rain really added something to the game. It changed the outcome of the game. There were a lot of fumbles, missed field goal etc. I also think the rich/priveledged people who get tickets to the superbowl had to sit in the rain and that is fun to know too.
2007-02-05 09:04:27 · answer #8 · answered by H 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, the Superbowl should be played, out in the elements, preferably where the teams are from. If they are from different climates, there should be a common ground for them to play on.
If they want to show that they are "the best", they should have to prove it by playing in all types of weather.
2007-02-05 09:11:30 · answer #9 · answered by rustybones 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
HELL NO this is football not baseball. There is no tarp or rain delays in football. One of the best games i saw was a Sunday night game between Jets and Dolphins it was like we used to play back in the day. In pouring rain! It was entertaining. What's better than turnover after turnover....its like a see saw.
2007-02-05 09:10:21 · answer #10 · answered by Big Bean 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No. If it were up to me there would be no domed stadiums. The weather is what it is, and teams should make adjustments when necessary.
2007-02-05 09:36:58 · answer #11 · answered by Jack R 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋