...and the lesser known,but equally great Cassius Clay?
2007-02-05 00:23:28 · 11 answers · asked by rab333 4 in Sports ➔ Other - Sports
Cassius Clay would have kicked Muhammed Ali's ***. Cassius was younger, quicker, brasher and so talented. He then got his licence taken away for not fighting in the Vietnam war. "No Vietcong ever called me N*****r". He then came back as Muhammed Ali and was good, but was never the same as the dazzling Clay.
2007-02-05 01:48:06 · answer #1 · answered by mickeyleon123 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
what percentage cases will we ought to do this? this question should be banned from the area. It pops up each and every 2-3 Weeks. seem at my different questions and also you'll see an similar answer some cases. i'm no longer doing this one anymore. i am going to grant you with the ending. seem up the strive against, as I call it, less than my solutions. truly one of ALI's dazzling Strengths is Tyson's dazzling weaknesses. ALI is a draw close of psychological conflict. Tyson's an noticeably weak minded, Fragile guy. For all his outside skill Mike turns into unrattled very truly. ALI may have he strive against received in the previous the first bell. flow do somewhat homework. ALI TKO eleven
2016-11-25 03:28:35 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ha Ha! It would have been a draw. With both sides claiming that they had won.
2007-02-05 00:30:12 · answer #3 · answered by gadmack2000 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Is this a trick question? I would think that if you were to beat the s**t out of yourself, neither of yourselves would win.
2007-02-05 00:31:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
A bit of shadow boxing..dont you think
2007-02-05 00:27:31 · answer #5 · answered by man with the golden gun 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
They are the same person you div
2007-02-05 00:26:52 · answer #6 · answered by Margaret 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jade Goody! If you believe the media!
2007-02-05 00:30:42 · answer #7 · answered by Keira H 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
ricky hatton
2007-02-05 00:44:25 · answer #8 · answered by billybobhomer 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
obviously i would have won
2007-02-05 00:32:38 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
erm, you're aware it's the same person?!
2007-02-05 00:26:29 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋