Better than Bush has. If she didn't look for him at all, she'd be doing better than Bush has. Bush has completely forgot about him, and doesn't think he's a top priority (remember the quote?).
And if he is captured, he would probably have a trial. I believe that was always the plan. Hussein got one, didn't he? There's no way he'd win, but he'd get a trial.
2007-02-04 23:47:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by amg503 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
Considering the fact that Bill Clinton was the only president who actually tried to kill Osama, I'd say the odds of your fanciful little attempt at a joke coming true are 0%.
You really should try and look at what Democrats really believe and do, as opposed to whipping the straw man parodies used by the likes of Pill Popping Rush Limbaugh.
What Conservative Pundits don't realize is that Hillary and Obama are sacrificial lambs. Conservatives will spend all their time and energy attacking those two, which will make the REAL Democratic candidate look like a golden boy.
The fact that you're spending your time ranting and raving about Hillary is just proof of how well that strategy is working.
If you sincerely want to see a Republican in the White House in 2008, then you need to look past the paper targets of Obama and Hillary to see who the Democrats are REALLY going to run for the Presidency.
Wasting time attacking Obama and Hillary just plays into the Democratic strategy for 2008.
2007-02-07 12:52:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mr Bin laden is safe and will not be caught, so Hillary will not have a chance. How long has Bush been after him?? If they really wanted to kill him it would be done, don't tell me that the CIA and the FBI with all their agents in the world can't find 1 man. They found Saddam hiding why not BINNIE. I don't think they want him at all, just a crappy lie from the White House .
2007-02-05 08:44:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by Aussie1 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bin Laden will never have a trial. If found he will commit suicide. He will refuse to be put on a public trial. You have to remember that Hillary was the one who forced Bush to commit $20 billion to Homeland Security in NYC instead of the measley $10 billion he wanted to give for security programs. She would have his fingernails ripped out, every digit sliced off, beheaded, boiled in oil, & sent back to al-qaeda in a soup can. She can be ruthless if she wants. And with good reason.
2007-02-05 08:11:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by gone 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
If she gets elected and if Bin Laden is still at large that would mean that Osama has been on the lose for over 7 years since 9/11. That doesn't say much about Bush and his efforts..
You can pull whatever "odds" out of the air that you want.
2007-02-05 08:50:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
If she even looks toward Saudi Arabia and SPITS, she will have done more than our present President, who SWORE to get bin Laden "Dead or Alive" and he was "gonna smoke him out of his hole". Remember these charming little Texas phrases, or are you just remembering "cut and run"? Here's a trip down memory lane.... remember the Republican "Contract with America"? No? Neither do any other Republicans.
Hell, if Madame Presdeint Clinton even mentions bin Laden's NAME in a State of the Union address, she will have done more than our current Failure in Chief has in 4 years..
Current overseas intelligence assessments believe Osama bin Laden is now living in Saudi Arabia with family in an undisclosed location. If he is indeed there, why have our Saudi allies not extradited this man into US custody? If he is NOT there, why have the Saudis not put pressure on bin Laden's relatives to turn him in? Why has the US government not even ASKED the Saudis to do this? Why did the Republican congress remove a $650 million provision to increase cargo inspections at our eastern and Ca sea ports (you know- the same seaports that same Republican congress was all in favor of selling to a Middle eastern country, namely DUBAI?)? Why does not ONE law enforcment officer in the US have some kind of government pamphlet or publication, telling him or her what to look for when trying to identify terrorist suspects on US soil? Or even something about what NOT to look for? Why is our "Terror Threat" Board still at "Elevated" if "Fighting the enemy 'over there' means NOT having to fight them here"? If Bush is so right concerning the threat of terror on the American people, why does he need to suspend the doctrine of habeas corpus to prosecute this war? Why is someone with a cold (who doesn't cover their mouths when they cough or sneeze) considered a Terrorist in the Republican Patriot Act? Why is there only one part time State Trooper assigned to patrol roughly 200 miles of unprotected Washington State shoreline? Why did Bush say there were no nuclear weapons in Iraq in 2000, then say there were in 2002, then after invading, saying we were there to remove a dictator, even though that dictator was his father's ally after the Iran Contra Scandal? If we are under threat, why arent our borders secure? I live in Arizona and we receive anywhere form 300 to 10,000 illegals a day into this state. 5 years and 8 TRILLION dollars later, we are no more secure today than we were pre- Sept 11.
2007-02-05 08:11:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
If Bin Laden were caught (and I garuntee he won't be so long as we're in Iraq) he would be sentenced by a world court. He would most likely be sentenced to death.
2007-02-05 07:57:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by Theophile 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Invite him round for brunch to discuss the topical issues of the day.
2007-02-05 09:04:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by dingdong 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
first of all she has to become the prez
then my best guess is she will relaunch a massive man hunt for him and declare that he has died due a us airstrike or joint us pakistan operation in nwfp or baluchistan
and in 10 months proclaim that al quaida is finished
2007-02-05 07:52:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
She would invite him to the White House so they could talk. Then they would have a press conference and be shown shaking hands. Then he will go back to his cave and laugh about how he fooled the President of the US and get back to planning the next attack. When the attack comes she will again invite him to the White House to talk. She would not consider trying to kill the man because he is evil, However she might talk him to death.
2007-02-05 07:46:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
5⤋