English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-02-04 20:38:31 · 9 answers · asked by Anashuya 6 in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

9 answers

Most music is free. But still the artist should be compensated for new works.
I Cr 13;8a

2007-02-04 20:47:58 · answer #1 · answered by ? 7 · 2 0

"Everything's free in America...for a small fee in America."

No, I don't think it should be. Popular music, as we know it, would cease to exist. Your favorite artists would not have the proper funding to continue making your favorite music. As much as we like to gripe about the cost of CDs, it is the only way to ensure continuance of the music we so love.

2007-02-05 11:09:31 · answer #2 · answered by Fox Paws 6 · 3 0

It should be free for anyone to express themselves through music, but I'm not sure if people will want to pay to hear them sing.

2007-02-05 04:42:58 · answer #3 · answered by Mrs. Shrek 5 · 2 0

will u think the same if u were an artist and MUSIC would be the way to EARN ya living from...

No ..don\t think so..coz they work for it..and they have to be payed for their work

2007-02-05 04:42:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Heck yeah, Then i can listen to all the Metallica i want.

2007-02-05 10:26:12 · answer #5 · answered by Speed Limit - 100 1 · 2 0

nah, thats like expecting actors to act in films for free... its their jobs

2007-02-05 04:46:59 · answer #6 · answered by supagrrrl84 5 · 2 0

It is. It echos in the cosmos for all eternity.

2007-02-05 04:42:25 · answer #7 · answered by BRAINS! 5 · 2 0

yea as long as your not gonna sell it for your personal benefit

2007-02-05 04:41:42 · answer #8 · answered by ?only?me? 6 · 3 1

No --

2007-02-05 04:44:08 · answer #9 · answered by Lolitta 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers