Nope !!!
bin laden is not the only one......but first we should be clear what is terrorism actualy !!
I call bush the worse terrorist than bin laden......the difference between the two is that bush has the tag of president of america...and he has a authority to give his terrorism some legal term and with his powerful media he can misguide peoples while bin laden can't.....and thats why bin laden is taken to be bad and bush is not !! Man !! whoever kills the innocent peoples is terrorist .....whether these innocents are american being killed in 9/11 or they are Iraqis and Afghanis being killed by American army or, they are palestinians who are being killed by israel.
2007-02-04 21:10:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
No. If we killed every terrorist we still couldn't end terrorism. It's an idea. You can't defeat or control the inner workings of the mind. Unless you lobotomized or brainwashed the population, but let's not give anybody any ideas.
I think the way to defeat terrorism is through acts of peace and human compassion. Stop killing people, send in the Peace Corp. A little honey draws more flies than vinegar?
2007-02-04 20:49:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by guy o 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course not. Al-Qaeda is very skilled at terrorist acts, but they certainly didn't invent the concept.
Truthfully, the Bush administration has no real interest in killing or capturing OBL. He's far more useful to them as a "boogeyman" out there on the loose.
It's entirely possible that OBL may already be dead. He was in poor health even before having to go into hiding, requiring dialysis treatment every so often.
And if he were already dead, Al-Qaeda wouldn't necessarily make that information public either.
2007-02-04 20:53:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
NO it will not end terrorism! If he is caught and killed then it needs to be done by a Muslim this way they don't make a Myrta out of him, build even more Al Quaeda Cells.
2007-02-04 20:50:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by wondermom 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course not. But I still support killing him and Zawahiri. I don't care what his pretextual justifications are, they are cold-blooded murderers.
They are the supreme cowards. They are full of all kinds of bloody rhetoric, such as, "we love death more than you love life." Really? So why were they so desperate to flee Tora Bora? Osama and Ayman (Zawahiri) are pretty persuasive at leading others to perform acts of suicide, but the same doctrine apparently doesn't apply to them.
The Koran (which he believes is the word of God) explicitly bans suicide. Therefore, if Osama and Ayman are so holy, what are they doing encouraging others to go against God's will?
Stalin used communism as a pretext for his own paranoid, alcoholic destruction of humanity. Hitler used national socialism as a pretext for his final solution. Osama is very similar.
2007-02-04 20:52:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by Jesus Jones 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
There was terrorism long before Bin Laden and there will be terrorism long afterward. Just talk to people from Israel or Ireland. It's almost amusing (if it weren't so sad) that some Americans seem to think terrorism *really* started in 2001.
(edited to say *some* Americans--I'm American myself, after all)
2007-02-04 20:41:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by Vaughn 6
·
1⤊
4⤋
To the contrary. He would symply become more of a martyr than he already is and attract more jihadists on top of those millions enlisted to the cause by Bush's irrational attack on Iraq.
Therefore, methinks he is sipping his espresso in Crawford , Texas by now.
2007-02-04 21:00:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by emiliosailez 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
No! the only way to end terrorism is to get rid of the Globalist Elite!!!! They are the real terrorists!!!
2007-02-04 21:19:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Nope
2007-02-04 20:39:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by . 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
it will not be the end of terrorism but atleast a message will be sent
2007-02-04 20:47:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋