Here is the paradox for scientists: a mother has to be a baby first, but a baby can't be born without a mother.
2007-02-04 19:51:06 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
the mother, also known as Eve.
2007-02-05 01:43:37 · answer #1 · answered by kimmycat 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think a mother came first. It's due to every single organism's developed from microoganisms and bacteria from the past. When each organism has been developed and faces revolution throughout the centuries, thus a complete form of human female with reproductive system is completed. Then, the female can reproduce next generations by giving birth to babies.
2007-02-04 19:57:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The Mother came first. Read Genesis.
I Cr 13;8a
2007-02-04 19:53:50 · answer #3 · answered by ? 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
The mother.
2007-02-04 19:55:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
The mother.
2007-02-04 19:54:38 · answer #5 · answered by debdini 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
AAAAHHH yes te age old paradox, I think it was the egg, dont listen to all the silly answers the baby was a conspiracy to make you believe that there is a chance you were a human......lol
2007-02-04 19:55:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Lame
2016-03-29 05:38:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The mother --
2007-02-04 20:13:57 · answer #8 · answered by Lolitta 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The father came first.
2007-02-04 20:00:05 · answer #9 · answered by MereMortal 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The father came first. That's how it works.
2007-02-04 19:59:04 · answer #10 · answered by RoninShonen 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋