None explication?!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-02-04 17:59:25 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Bush wasn't elected .
And neither will the next president.
2007-02-04 18:01:18 · answer #1 · answered by MADLYNN 3 · 5⤊ 3⤋
Chaos and Confusion that is why the embarrassment of the Oval office when Clinton was in made the dumb voters focus on infidelity instead of the real issues of our government. I mean Duh? we are human right? And we do promote sex on tv right? Like Viagra, etc.,? No man is beyone infidelity at times. That was a forgone conclusion, but the Republicans counted on the Moral majority like Rush Limbaugh a drug addict? To disuade the voters to a more conservative approach of a good ole boy that looked like a nerd anyway, ( for who would have him?) right?
Anyway that last part was a joke. But anyway the stupid public elected a criminal twice? Nixon? eh? So what else is new? We are all played like tunes on a Fisher Price Toy, because we don't stick together and because we are so brainwashed with the things that are promoted through the media that is bought and paid for eh? Put the dots together for yourself? Where does blind loyalty come from? Ignorance! And in this case Ignorance is not bliss! You have to watch and investigate these people just like they are doing to you and me right now. What makes you think they have more of a right than you do to investigate? You are giving them the right, and you don't see it. You are giving them the right to give them the right to do and say for you and you don't even know them? Why? you wouldn't give the keys to your car to a stranger would you? It is the same philosophy, and no it is not different, because it is only common sense that you don't elect someone for a party or because of preference of looks , creed, color, race, or religion. And certainly not because you think he is a lame dick and he won't ever cheat on his wife in the oval office? ha ha Because that is a personal matter and if she did not leave him then what is it for us to nose into. For all we know this Bush guy could dress up like a woman? Have you investigated it ? Not! And no we would not know about it till twenty years later if so, because he owns the CIA. Or should I say the loyal achtung fellows. Why should anyone believe in anyone 100% that is blind deaf and dumb and lazy. What did you think we are a mature audience? We are only trying to be adults and smart, and we will always be humans that make mistakes. But unfortunately not as bad as these last 6 years? eh?
2007-02-05 02:19:18 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The explanation is simple. When Bush ran the second time the war in Iraq was reasonably quiet (certainly not like now) and his popularity was fairly high. Furthermore, he ran against a dummy who couldn't win bubble gum in a machine. The major criticisms against Bush came later and most of these criticisms were correct. He listened to his stupid advisers and screwed up the conflict in Iraq. Now he is disliked even more. He is too stiff and arrogant and also isn't terribly bright, so people finally found out what he is like and they don't like him or his self-confident style.
2007-02-05 06:38:18 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because the Dems ran that jackhole Kerry against him. They might as well have run Mickey Mouse... actually they'd have had more luck with Micky. Everyone likes Micky.
2007-02-05 02:10:01 · answer #4 · answered by Jadalina 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
this is actually very interesting, i read an article in wikipedia yesterday about the hole punching method that was used in somestates where is a WHOLE hole wasn't punched the vote wasn't counted, and then some people were persuaded not to vote because of misterious phone calls and etc... and that 11% of the african american population's vote weren't counted because of this or something because they were more likely to vote democrats etc..
2007-02-05 02:11:22 · answer #5 · answered by JepJep92 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Electoral vote, not the popular vote. People are like sheep when it comes to voting. The republicans drag the whole alzhimers ward out to help them vote. We won't make that mistake again. It's all going democrat.
2007-02-05 02:05:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Because the man that ran against him is schizophrenic (says one thing and does the opposite) and insane (does the same thing expecting different results).
2007-02-05 02:18:16 · answer #7 · answered by acesfourpal 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because it wasn't his voters critisizing him....the news/media shows negativity. Base your beliefs on facts, not what you see in the media.
2007-02-05 02:04:08 · answer #8 · answered by lovemytc 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because a large portion of the voting public are not "thinkers" - By the way, I bet a lot of the people who voted for him a second time regret it.
2007-02-05 02:02:56 · answer #9 · answered by Star 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
People don't like change during a "war."
2007-02-05 02:02:57 · answer #10 · answered by Michele B 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You asked this before
Infact all your questions are about george bush.
good thing he has no points left now
2007-02-05 02:02:09 · answer #11 · answered by tothebatmobile 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋